My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010357
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010357
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:22:17 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:52:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010357
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' selected as an alternative method of collecting the data A slug test is a method of measuring <br /> aquifer characteristics which does not require extracting water from the well The test consists <br /> of lowering a solid cylinder (the slug) into and out of the well and measuring the rate at which <br />' the water level returns to the original static elevation Slug tests were performed on wells MW- <br /> 4, MW-6 and MW-8 and the data analyzed using the Aqtesolv computer software The results <br />' of these tests are presented in Section 3 4 below and in Appendix C <br /> 2.5 Tidal Influence Characterization <br />' The protect work plan also called for an investigation of the possible influence of diurnal tidal <br /> effects on the groundwater gradient beneath the site due to the site's close proximity to tidally <br />' influenced water bodies such as the Stockton deep water channel and the Mormon Slew The <br /> work plan called for installation of a water level recorder on one of the new monitoring wells <br /> for a period of one week However, due to the problem of maintaining the security of equipment <br />' and personnel in the downtown area, an alternate approach was used which required significantly <br /> less time but still provided the needed information This approach consisted of measuring the <br /> water levels in well MW-4 over a period of approximately four and a half hours to see if <br />' additional study was warranted Results of these measurements indicated a possible minor tidal <br /> influence in MW-4 <br />' 3.0 FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION <br /> This section presents the analytical results of groundwater sampling from the five new <br /> monitoring wells, presents an interpretation of the geologic and hydrologic conditions of the site, <br /> then interprets the analytical data with respect to the geologic and hydrogeologic conditions of <br /> the site <br />' 3.1 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results <br /> P g Yt <br />' The analytical results of groundwater sampling are presented in Table 1 A complete analytical <br /> report is presented in Appendix D These results indicate that gasoline-related hydrocarbon <br />' compounds are present in several of the wells, with the highest concentrations found in MW-7 <br /> with 190 µg/L and 1700 lAglL of benzene and TPH-G, respectively. There were no significant <br /> concentrations of TPH-D, EDB or total lead found in any of the wells Figure 3 shows the <br />' groundwater analytical results plotted on the site map next to the appropriate well locations <br /> 3.2 QA/QC Results <br /> IResults of the trip blank analyses indicate that sample integrity was maintained during sample <br /> transport. The blind duplicate sample, MW-10, showed good correlation with the primary <br />' sample of MW-5 The equipment decontamination sample, MW-11, showed a trace of benzene <br /> which suggests that small quantities of benzene may have remained after sampling the last well <br /> on the first sampling day However, due to the order of sampling and the relative benzene <br />' concentrations found in the wells sampled that day, the benzene trace (3 2 µg/L) does not impact <br /> the sampling integrity No hydrocarbons were detected in the second equipment decontamination <br /> blank, MW-12 <br />' xf's/src WP 7 ae oroz <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.