My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PORT & G
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521988
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:44:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 3:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0521988
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014964
FACILITY_NAME
CALIF AMMONIA CO (CALAMCO)
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PORT & G
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
PORT & G RD 15
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\(rink <br /> Southwest, ]uric. <br /> was placed in the boring holes above the bentonite seal to approximately 1 foot bgs. The <br /> wellheads were secured with locking well caps and completed with 12-inch-diameter Emco- <br /> Wheaton traffic lids installed in minimum 24-inch square concrete pads. Well construction <br /> details are included on the boring logs in Appendix A. <br /> 8.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND MONITORING <br /> Following installation, the wells were developed using a vacuum truck on October 16, 2003. A <br /> dedicated clean stinger constructed of 1'/z-inch Schedule 40 PVC was inserted into each well. <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, depth to groundwater in the monitoring wells was measured to <br /> 0.01-foot accuracy from the top of the well casings using an electronic oil/water interface probe. <br /> A minimum of three to four well volumes of water was purged from each of the monitoring wells <br /> prior to sampling using the vacuum truck. The wells were allowed to recharge to at least 80% of <br /> the static head prior to sample collection. <br /> A groundwater sample was collected from each well by lowering a disposable bailer <br /> approximately 2 feet into the water column. The bailer was recovered and the water decanted <br /> into appropriate laboratory-supplied containers. The containers were labeled, then placed <br /> immediately into a chilled cooler and maintained at approximately 4 degrees centigrade for <br /> delivery to a CDHS-certified laboratory for analyses. Strict chain-of-custody protocol was <br /> followed throughout field and laboratory procedures. The samples were analyzed for NH3-N by <br /> EPA Method 350.2 by the analytical testing laboratory and for pH using a calibrated field <br /> instrument. <br /> In a similar manner, existing Port of Stockton groundwater wells MW 3-4 and MW 3-6, located <br /> east and southeast of the tank farm, were sampled and analyzed for NH3-N by EPA Method <br /> 350.2 and pH using a calibrated field instrument. <br /> The static depth of groundwater water was found to range from 11.87 to 13.98 feet bgs. The <br /> local groundwater gradient appeared to be a nose that channels water from northwest to northeast <br /> with gradients varying from 0.0043 ft/ft to 0.0065 ft/ft (averaging 0.0050 ft/ft in a generally <br /> northern direction). The groundwater gradient is depicted on Figure 4. <br /> 725.PRI.00 Page 6 December 4,2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.