Laserfiche WebLink
subsequent analyses. Communication with the laboratory suggest <br /> -. there may have been some error in sampling handling, analysis <br /> and/or result confirmation procedures. The laboratory results <br /> for the domestic well samplings are presented in Appendix III. <br /> A review of the laboratory water analysis data and Dissolved <br /> Eydrocarbons in Water Maps permits the following trends and <br /> observations to be made: <br /> i <br /> - Although initial analysis suggested that a number of <br /> - domestic wells contained detectable concentrations of dissolved <br /> - hydrocarbons subsequent analysis of four sample rounds indicate f <br /> the levels to be below method detection limits suggesting that <br /> the initial results were in error. <br /> - A dissolved plume elongated in a southeasterly direction, <br /> the general direction of the g_oundwater flow, extends a distance <br /> .�� of approximately 300 feet down gradient. <br /> Increases in the dissolved concentrations ;n monitoring <br /> wells 5 and 8 between the July 17 and the August 4, 1986 samp- <br /> lings suggest that _he dissolved plume is migrating in a south- <br /> easterly to easterly direction. <br /> ! t <br /> E IHITTAL ABATEMENT PROGRAM <br /> PRODUCT RECOVERY <br /> s Because free product accumulated within monitoring wells 1 <br /> and 4 just after their installation in early May 1986, the San <br /> Joaquin County Local Health District required the initiation of . <br /> product a recovery program. A periodic hand bailing program was <br /> started on May b, 1986, to begin recovery of the accumulated <br /> product. In early July, a small diameter double pumping system <br /> was installed in the 4 inch monitoring well 4 to initiate some <br /> 22 <br /> i; <br />