My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCOTTS
>
1033
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545679
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 11:52:40 AM
Creation date
5/20/2020 11:45:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545679
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005644
FACILITY_NAME
ATCHISON TOPEKA & SANTA FE RR*
STREET_NUMBER
1033
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SCOTTS
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1033 E SCOTTS AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s: <br /> U11VINR�i�MENTAL HEALTH <br /> �I-1M N�, SOR10CE <br /> Chem/�isk 913 JUL 2 r PM 1: 5'4 <br /> A Division of McLareniHart <br /> Environmental Engineering <br /> 100 North First Street, Suite 210 <br /> Burbank, CA 91502 <br /> (818) 841-0606 <br /> r FAX (818) 841-0896 <br /> July 19, 1993 <br /> Diane M. Hinson, REHS <br /> Supervising Environmental Health Specialist <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 445 North San Joaquin Street <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br /> SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING THE RISK <br /> ASSESSMENT FOR THE SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY SITE IN <br /> STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> Dear Ms. Hinson: <br /> f <br /> ChemRisk®understands that you are completing your review of the risk assessment for the <br /> Santa Fe Railway Company Site located at 1033 East Scotts Avenue and is pleased to <br /> answer any questions you may have. Discussed in this letter are responses to your questions <br /> during our telephone conversation on Friday,July.16, 1993. <br /> Your first question was regarding the soil pH used in the modeling and its effect on the <br /> migration of organic chemicals. ChemRisk® used a neutral pH value of 7. The value was <br /> not site-specifically determined because of its minimal impact on the fate and transport of <br /> the petroleum hydrocarbons in the SESOIL modeling. <br /> For organic chemicals, the pH value is used in SESOIL's.hydrologic cycle to estimate the <br /> hydrolysis rate constant, which is the rate at which an organic molecule reacts with water <br /> to form a new chemical. It specifies any hydrolysis reactions that may be catalyzed by the <br /> ' presence of hydrogen ions (H+) and/or hydroxide ions (OH). The hydrolysis results in a <br /> ,loss of total mass in the soil column that is available for migration. ChemRisk® has <br /> maintained a conservative approach by specifying that none_of the petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> is able to undergo any acid/base hydrolysis. Thus, the value specifying the pH for the soil <br /> is not used. This conservative procedure was performed by specifying that the acid and base <br /> hydrolysis constants in the chemical input file be zero. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.