Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE <br /> 3.3 ANALYsIs OF DATA <br /> An analysis of the sample results was done to determine if Site soil was the origin of the <br /> hydrocarbons detected in the groundwater at the Santa Fe Site To perform this analysts, <br /> chromatograms were obtained for soil samples as well as for the groundwater samples The <br /> chromatograms from the soil and groundwater were compared for characteristics such as (l) <br /> retention time (for compound identification), (2) number of peaks (indicative of number of <br /> chemicals present), (3) peak height (indicative of concentrations of each chemical), and ratios <br /> between peak heights (indicative of ratios of concentrations of chemicals) <br /> Three chromatograms from the background soil samples taken in January, 1991 were run by <br /> Sequoia Analytical It should be noted that no detectable levels of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were found upon analysis of the soil samples The chromatogram from the first soil sample, <br /> SFW-1-1 revealed the highest peaks at 11 05, 12 68, 13 12, 16 93, and 23 41 minutes <br /> (Figure 3-7) The chromatogram from the second soil sample, SFW-2-1 revealed the highest <br /> peaks at 11 05, 12 68, 16 93, and 23 41 minutes (Figure 3-8) The chromatogram for the <br /> third soil sample, SFW-3-1 revealed the highest peaks at 11 61, 12 68, 16 93, and 23 42 <br /> minutes (Figure 3-9) The chromatogram for the groundwater detect in SFW-1 revealed the <br /> highest peaks at 10 27, 11 05, and 11 61 minutes (Figure 3-10) The chromatogram for the <br /> groundwater detect in SFW-2 revealed the highest peaks at 10 26. 11 04, and 13 42 minutes <br /> (Figure 3-11) The chromatogram for the groundwater detect in SFW-3 revealed the highest <br /> peaks at 10 27, 11 06, and 12 68 minutes (Figure 3-12). In comparing the soil <br /> chromatograms with the groundwater chromatograms, it is apparent that there are similar <br /> constituents present in both background soil and groundwater It is therefore likely that the <br /> chemicals in the groundwater from this round of sampling originate from background levels <br /> of chemicals in the soil and not from petroleum hydrocarbons at the Site <br /> Another detect was found in the groundwater in the sampling round taken on May 19, 1993 <br /> Total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons were detected to SFW-3 at 64 lig/L (ppb) The <br /> chromatogram for this sample had the highest peaks at 9 50, 13 56, and 15 76 minutes <br /> (Figure 3-13) A standard using diesel was run in conjunction with the SFW-3 sample The <br /> standard chromatogram had several peals and the chromatogram did not appear to resemble <br /> that for the SFW-3 groundwater sample (Figure 3-14) Therefore, it is not likely that what <br /> was detected in the groundwater is diesel tuel <br /> An analytical chemist (Craig Lee) at Sequoia Analytical (the company responsible for <br /> generating the chromatograms from the groundwater and soil samples from the Site), stated <br /> in a conversation on April 11, 1994 that the chromatograms represented by Figures 3-7 <br /> through and including 3-13 do not resemble those obtained from fuel samples Rather, it is <br /> more likely that the peaks represent some organic material in the soil such as rotting leaves <br /> F <br /> G%MDF]MOVMCLOSURE%%1C%%M717 W_ 5 <br /> i <br />