Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE <br /> 3.0 PARTMONING STUDIES <br /> 3.1 SAMPLING <br /> In April, 1993, ChemRisk® obtained two soil samples containing Site-related hydrocarbons at <br /> depths of 13-14 feet below ground surface to conduct partitioning studies These studies <br /> were performed by Global Geochemistry Corporation The studies were performed to <br /> determine which, if any, of the petroleum hydrocarbons constituents which were present in <br /> the soil may partition into percolating water To maximize the potential migration of the <br /> hydrocarbons, the soil samples were mixed with distilled water, placed in sealed bottles with <br /> no headspace, and rotated on a rolling table for 48 hours at room temperature The samples <br /> were then filtered to collect the water The filtered water was extracted using methylene <br /> chloride to isolate the extractable organic material In order to separate the aromatic <br /> hydrocarbons from the polar compounds, the sample was separated using column <br /> chromatography Finally, to see if any hydrocarbons were present at extremely low Ievels in <br /> the sample, the saturate fraction was concentrated and injected into a gas chromatogram <br /> 3.2 SAMPLINc. RESULTS <br /> Results showed that no petroleum hydrocarbons had partitioned into the water The resulting <br /> chromatograms for the water extract and laboratory water blank are presented in Figures 3-1 <br /> and 3-2, respectively The sample was then concentrated an additional 10-fold to below <br /> normal detection limits to qualitatively determine whether any hydrocarbons had partitioned <br /> into the water <br /> The concentrated sample revealed that the straight chain hydrocarbons from C,4 to C19 and <br /> various branched chain hydrocarbons were present at extremely low concentrations in the <br /> water (Figure 3-3) It is not possible to determine the origin of these hydrocarbons it is <br /> likely that the source is the laboratory water (the same peaks were present in both the sample <br /> and the blank) (Figures 3-4 and 3-4, respectively) Another possible source may be organic <br /> material in the soil A third possible source is petroleum hydrocarbons These <br /> concentrations could not be quantified because they were below the normal analytical <br /> detection limit <br /> The original soil samples were also extracted using methylene chloride and separated on a <br /> column in the same manner as described above The saturate fractions of the two samples <br /> were combined to perform the gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass <br /> spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis and the aromatic tractions were also combined for GC-MS <br /> analysis The soil and blank chromatograms are presented in Figures 3-5 and 3-6, <br /> respectively <br /> f <br /> G%"ELmoPrrDCLOSURE%ML-QSOkM71 7 00' 4 <br />