My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010151
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 4:11:37 PM
Creation date
5/21/2020 10:11:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010151
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Air Sparge/ Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test <br /> An air sparge/soil vapor extraction pilot test was conducted at the site during the period from <br /> February 27 io March 4, 2002, to determine the feasibility of air sparging and in-situ well <br /> aeration technologies The pilot test was performed in three stages an air sparge test, a soil vapor <br /> extraction test, and a combined soil vapor extraction/air sparge test Data was collected during <br /> the pilot test to measure the system radius of influence, size equipment, and to assess off-gas <br /> treatment options <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction Test <br /> The soil vapor extraction test was performed on vapor extraction well VE-1, located in the <br /> former UST excavation source area Existing monitor well MW-13 and newly installed dual <br /> completion well VE-2 were used as observation wells during the test The monitoring points <br /> were selected to provide both horizontal and vertical data at varying distances from the <br /> extraction point <br /> I The pilot test involved extracting soil vapors from the extraction well using a VACLEAN Model <br /> 1000 Vapor Extraction Treatment System The system employs a 12 2 Hp belt-driven blower <br /> with a maximum vacuum capacity of 14 4 inches of mercury (Hg) Off-gas vapors were routed <br />' through the VACLEAN internal combustion engine and the exhaust was treated by a catalytic <br /> converter The pilot test was operated at three stepped vacuum and flow rates At each step, <br /> vacuum response levels were allowed to equilibrate before increasing the vacuum and flow rate <br />' at the extraction well <br /> During the pilot test, measurements of vacuum, flowrate , and off-gas concentrations were <br />' recorded for vapor extraction well VE-1 (Table 4) The observation wells were monitored for <br /> vacuum responses (Table 4) Vacuum and flow readings were measured with magnehellc <br /> gauges Off-gas concentrations were measured with a Photionization Detector(PID) prior to <br />' treatment with the VACLEAN unit One off-gas sample was collected in a Tedlar bag at the end <br /> of the soil vapor extraction pilot test for laboratory analysis <br />' Following completion of the pilot test,the data was tabulated (Table 4) and graphs (Appendix F) <br /> were plotted to assess the radius of influence of the SVE system Vacuum influence was <br /> measured in both observation wells MW-13 (19 5 feet from VE-1) and VE-2 (28 75 feet from <br />' VE-1) The vacuum response was very similar across both screened zones 15 to 25 feet bgs <br /> (VE-2B) and 30 to 40 feet bgs (VE-2A) in dual completion well VE-2 This indicates that soil <br />' vapor extraction would be effective in remediating soils throughout much of the vadose zone, <br /> including impacted soils in the former tankpit excavation area as well as those near the saturated <br /> zone <br />' A graph showing the natural log of the vacuum versus distance from vapor extraction well VE-1 <br /> (Appendix F) indicates that a radius of influence of at least 30 feet can be achieved in the vicinity <br /> t of the former UST source area As illustrated in the graph showing vacuum versus radius of <br /> influence (Appendix.F), a vacuum of 59 inches of water column(w c ) was required to achieve <br /> this radius of influence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.