Laserfiche WebLink
1 GeoAudit 2/26/93 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> the VES design were presented in the referenced work plan. The <br /> volume of gasoline in the soil was "liberally" estimated in the <br />' work plan to be 18,500 pounds (3000 gallons) . <br /> A vapor extraction well was installed at the location of the former <br /> UST and a VES consisting of a 100 cubic feet per minute (CFM) <br />' blower, internal combustion engine and peripheral equipment was <br /> installed. Operation of the system began on August 15, 1991 . <br />' VES OPERATION <br /> The VES has been in operation for approximately 81 percent of the <br />' time since start-up except for a period between February 14 , 1992 <br /> and March 27, 1992 when the system was down for repairs. Total <br /> hours of operation were 8,864 on December 28, 1992 . The VES is <br /> operated under permit requirements of The San Joaquin Air Pollution <br />' Control District order number 91-61 . <br /> The VES has extracted vapors at a rate of approximately 60 CFM <br /> during the project. VES intake, pre-catalyzer and outlet <br /> hydrocarbon vapor concentrations are measured on a weekly basis <br /> except when the system is down. Organic vapors are measured using <br /> a photoionizati.on detector (PID) calibrated to isobutylene. <br />' The VES stream has extracted vapor from Well MW-2 for the entire <br /> project except when switched to Well MW-1 for approximately four <br />' days in December 1992 . Very low hydrocarbon concentrations were <br /> measured in the inlet soil vapor stream from Well MW-1, therefore, <br /> the system was switched back to Well MW-2 . <br /> STATUS OF THE REMEDIATION PROGRAM <br />' Hydrocarbon concentrations in recovered soil vapors have been <br /> reduced from a high approaching 2,500 ppm in mid 1991 to <br /> approximately 500 ppm at the end of 1992 . A plot of the inlet <br /> hydrocarbon vapor concentrations versus time is presented in Figure <br />' 3 . A comparison of Inlet and outlet concentrations indicate that <br /> a hydrocarbon destruction efficiency of greater than 90 percent has <br /> been achieved throughout the remediation project. <br />' The relationship between the actual concentrations of hydrocarbons <br /> in the inlet stream and the monitoring values as isobutylene using <br /> the PID have been reported in the past to be approximately 10: 1 . <br /> This relationship effects the timing of future activities. <br /> Therefore, actions are planned to more accurately determine this <br /> relationship. These actions are discussed in the following <br />' section. <br />