SU0013318 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No . PC : 7-2-87 SU-87-21 Page 1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the Hempstead Court Subdivision on the basis that the roadway layout within the subdivision does not provide for alternative access or for future access to adjacent areas, and on the basis that Findings No . 1 , 2 , 3 , and 7 cannot be made . FINDINGS 1 . "The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans . " ° This finding cannot be made because the proposed map is in conflict with Rural Residential Principle No . 5 relating to adequate drainage . No Specific Plan is involved. 2 . "The design or improvement of the proposed division is con- sistent with applicable General and Specific Plans . " This finding cannot be made because the proposed design does not provide adequate circulation for the subdivision. 3 . "The site is physically suitable for the type of development . " This finding cannot be made because access to some of the subdivision lots cannot be provided within the length limi- tation for cul-de-sac streets . 4 . "The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development . " This finding can be made because the proposed lots meet the minimum parcel size required by the Planning Title . 5 . "The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat . " ° This finding can be made because an Environmental Assessment prepared for the project indicated that fish and wildlife habitat will not be affected by the proposed sub- division. 6 . "The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems . "