SU0013318 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 3 PC: 7-2-87 SU-87-21 Page 1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission leny the Femrstead Court Subdivision on the basis that the roadway layout within the- subdivision does not provide for alternative access or for future access to adjacent areas, and on the basis that Findings No. 1 , 2, 6, 10, and 11 cannot be made. FINDINGS 1 . "The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. " ° This finding cannot be made because the proposed map is in conflict with Rural Residential Principle No. 5, which sta- tes that "new development will require the provision of adequate drainage. " No Specific Plan is involved. 2. "The design or improvement of the proposed division is con- sistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. " ° This finding cannot be made because the proposed design does not provide adequate circulation for the subdivision. 3. "The site is physically suitable for the type of development . " This finding can be made because the project site is rela- tively flat and does not have any development constraints. 4. "The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. " ° This finding can be made because the proposed lots meet the minimum parcel size required by the Planning Title. 5. "The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat . " ° This finding can be made because an Environmental Assessment prepared for the project did not identify any significant effects on fish and wildlife habitat . 6. "The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. " This finding cannot be made because the proposed storm water pond may not be of adequate size to provide safe drainage.