Laserfiche WebLink
subsurface utilities. An access entry agreement had not been reached with the private property <br /> owner for that work at the time of the drilling, consequently additional borings were not <br /> advanced on the Delta Disposal property. <br /> All drilling equipment and sampling tools were cleaned prior to arriving, and before leaving the <br /> site. The sampler was retrieved and dissembled, and the soil filled acetate liner was sealed with <br /> Teflon paper or foil and plastic endcaps, labeled, logged onto chain-of-custody forms and place <br /> in a chilled ice chest on crushed ice. Soil sample intervals retained for chemical analysis were <br /> cut from the liners at depths of suspected contaminant presence. <br /> The boreholes were logged using the Unified Soil Classification System under the supervision of <br /> a registered geologist. Additional lithologic information was collected to describe the subsurface <br /> geology. Soil samples were field screened for petroleum soil vapor using a photoionization <br /> vapor meter calibrated to the manufacturers specifications. Soil samples were collected at <br /> minimum five-foot intervals, at intervals of apparent obvious contamination and/or at <br /> stratigraphic features of interest. Upon completion of the borehole drilling and collection of <br /> water samples, all boreholes were backfilled with grout, placed from the bottom to top of the <br /> borehole and a PHS EHD representative witnessed the borehole sealing process as well as <br /> portions of the drilling and sampling work. <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> Each exploratory boring was sampled. The ground water samples collected from the boreholes <br /> were used for a reconnaissance of the site groundwater contamination. A brief summary of these <br /> procedures follows: Each borehole was advanced into the aquifer and temporarily cased for <br /> sampling. Depth to groundwater measurements in some boreholes were made to the nearest one- <br /> one hundredth of one foot to the surface grade, and also checked for the presence of separate <br /> phase product. The water entering the borehole was sampled using a clean disposable bailer or <br /> downhole sampling tube, and carefully poured into the appropriate laboratory prepared container <br /> with minimum cavitation. Each water sample was labeled, logged onto a chain-of-custody form, <br /> and placed in a chilled ice chest for transport to the laboratory. <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> Three borings were advanced in the public right of way in front of the referenced site. Borings <br /> B-1 and B-2 were advanced through the asphalt patches assumed to correspond with the former <br /> tank pit locations. The borings revealed sandy clay and sandy silt to depths of nine to 14 feet <br /> below surface grade. A sequence of interbedded sand, sandy clay and clayey sand under the clay <br /> and silt strata to depths of 19 to 24 feet. These strata compose the uppermost aquifer strata. <br /> Clayey sated and silty clay underlie the aquifer strata. These clayey strata appear laterally <br /> discontin,4ous in the general area of the site investigation (see Figure 1). Groundwater occurs at <br /> depths of 15.5 to 16 feet and appeared to be unconfined however boreholes were not open long <br /> QA040 to allow for 24 hours of stabilization for additional groundwater measurements. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> i <br />