Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> June 15, 1992 R CNP#A <br /> . Fire Engine Company No 2, Stockton, California <br /> PRESENT GROUND-WATER SAMPLING <br /> On April 17, 1992, a technician from RFSNA measured the water-levels in wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-4 and collected groundwater samples from the wells for subjective and <br /> laboratory analyses The field methods and procedures used are presented as an attachment <br /> to this report Water samples from wells MW-1 through MW-4 exhibited no subjective <br /> evidence of hydrocarbons during this site visit (Table 1) Purge water from the wells was <br /> stored temporarily in 55-gallon steel drums pending the results of laboratory analyses The <br /> City of Stockton is responsible for the disposal of the purge water <br /> The top of the four monitoring wells were surveyed relative to mean sea level and the <br /> ground-water flow direction and gradient were evaluated as described in the attached Field <br /> Procedures The ground-water gradient on April 17, 1992, was approximately 0 006 with <br /> a flow direction to the north, as shown on Plate 3 The direction of ground-water flow <br /> previously ranged from southeast to north-east with gradients of 0 0028 to 0 033 The <br /> elevations of the ground-water surface in each well are shown in Table 1 <br /> Ground-water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> and as diesel (TPHd) using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015 <br />• (modified for gasoline and diesel) and for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene <br /> isomers (BTEX) using EPA Method 602 These samples were analyzed at RESNA <br /> Environmental Laboratories in Rancho Cordova, California (Hazardous Waste Testing <br /> Laboratory Certificate No E773) <br /> Results of laboratory analyses indicated that dissolved TPHd was not detected in water <br /> sampled from the four wells, and dissolved TPHg was not detected in ground water <br /> collected from well MW-3 TPHg and benzene were detected in the water sampled from <br /> well MW-1 at concentrations of 960 parts per billion (ppb) and 142 ppb, respectively TPHg <br /> was detected at concentrations of 1.00 and 54 ppb in water sampled from wells MW-2 and <br /> MW-4,respectively,concentrations of BTEX compounds were below maximum contaminant <br /> levels recommended for drinking water by the California Department of Health Services. <br /> Results of laboratory analyses are summarized in Table 2 Copies of the laboratory analysis <br /> reports are attached <br /> osoa,esc 2 <br /> 3soo9-a <br />