Laserfiche WebLink
I� <br /> Two soil samples were taken at a depth of lit feet, from <br /> the north and south ends of the tank locations respectively <br /> Ml NR; and TK2 NR S) . Two (2) line samples were also taken, <br /> L piping 1 at 51 , 18' from the south edge: of the excavatc+in and <br /> piping 2 at 31 , under the former pump island l ocat i+_+n (see <br /> map #5) . Fear cOrap+asits were taken from the spoil pile before <br /> it was returned to the excavation. 'Sample analyses results <br /> showed detectable quantities of TPP--diesel in all samples, TK1 <br /> S-2300 mg/kg, TK1 N•--1100 rag/kg, TKA' S-24C) rag/kg, TK2 N--120 <br /> rng/kg, piping 1--2700 rag/kg, piping 2--140 wig/kg and the <br /> compos i t s SF11 , 2, 3 and 4 showed a combined t i_+t a 1 +--+f 900 <br /> rilg/kg. Detectable levels of B. E. T. R X were found in samples <br /> TM N, Total Xylenes--44 ug/kr]. TK1 S, ug/kcq, Ethyl : . <br /> Denaene-330 ug/I<g and Total Xylene?-9P_(') ,ag/k.g. Piping 1, <br /> Toluene-34 ug/kg,: Ethyl Benzene-47 .3 ug/kg and Total Xylene--51.0 <br /> ug/kg. Cowp+_+sits SPI , 2, a and 4 combined show Total Xylenes-13 <br /> Ug/kg. All samples were analyzed using California DOFIS LUFT <br /> method for diesel / 3550 and constituent volatile aromatics, <br /> Bent6nt*, Ethyl Benzene, Toluene and Total Xylene (BETX) using <br /> USEPA Test Method 8021) (!gee sini l sample analyses chart ) . <br /> Soil real+::+ved from the cCALth0aR5t and northeast corners of <br /> the tank locations showed signs of sr._+i l discoUnrcrt ion and had <br /> an odor of petroleum. There was no obvious sign of contamin- <br /> ation <br /> ontamin-ation on' the west side of the excavation. <br /> Based Upon the results of soil sample analyses, concentra- <br /> tions <br /> ontentr'a-- <br /> tion+s of TPH and ,the volatile aromatics present in the tank <br /> and pipeline Eiresr�-s, additional site characterization and/or, <br /> remediation will :'be required for closure. <br /> G. Remediation Steps C+_-ncre t e Inc. has retained WM. <br /> Hunter and Associates Registered Geole7r)ists and Jim Thorpe <br /> Oil, Inc_. to undertake the next phases +nf this cleanup prOject. <br /> After consultation with GJPHS/EHD, Wm. Hunter and Associates <br /> and Jird Thorpe Oil, Inc. , Concrete Inc. has decided to remove <br /> as much of the contamination remaining beneath the tank pit <br /> L area as passible by over excavation. The proposed excavation <br /> will start approximately 5 feet north of the north end of the <br /> original excavation and extend si-nuthward a distance of <br /> approximatc--ly 40 -feet. The new excavation will extend 2o feet <br /> in an easterly direction from the western boundry of the <br /> cirginal tank locition. The plan is to excavate to a depth of <br /> 20 feet and slight ad.jctstwents, up or down, made: if necessary. <br /> The resulting excavation will be appy!�xiniately 20 feet wide by <br /> 40 feet long by 18 to lir feet deep (sec- drawings 02 & 3) . <br /> Pipeline excavation will be necessary as the piping <br /> :samples indicate c=ontamination along the: product line route. <br /> This contamination will be removed by excavating a trench <br /> eight (8) feet deep and eight (8) feet wide along the path of <br /> RECEWE ED APP 2 'S' 19� <br />