My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VALPICO
>
75
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506509
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:26:14 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:12:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0506509
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007466
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP (FORMER)
STREET_NUMBER
75
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VALPICO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95336
APN
24613007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
75 W VALPICO RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
552
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Julie Raining • -4- <br /> Recommendations <br /> GP recommends natural attenuation as the preferred remedial alternative because it is effective and <br /> would achieve the remedial goal at the lowest cost. GP proposes to submit a natural attenuation work <br /> plan for Board approval during the third and/or fourth quarter of 1997. The work plan would include <br /> ground water monitoring parameters and calculation of chloroform degradation rates. <br /> I do not agree with GP's conclusion that natural attenuation is the preferred remedial alternative. <br /> Although it appears to be the most economical alternative from GP's evaluation, it is not the most <br /> effective. GP should further evaluate the effectiveness of natural attenuation, ground water pump and <br /> treat, and AS/SVE based on the comments in this letter. GP should recalculate the time required for <br /> natural attenuation to remediate chloroform to less than the remedial goal in the source area, <br /> considering a half-life of 5.5 years. The conditions for maximum natural degradation should be <br /> identified as well as those conditions not as favorable to degradation. <br /> The evaluation of ground water pump and treat should include an estimate of the time required to meet <br /> the remedial goal by this approach. The potential effectiveness of AS/SVE should also be evaluated <br /> further by researching its effectiveness at other sites. <br /> The cost to implement ground water pump and treat should be estimated and more details on the cost <br /> estimate for AS/SVE provided with consideration given to ways to reduce the costs of AS/SVE. <br /> GP proposes to locate, redevelop, and sample wells BC9, BC10, and BCl l if appropriate (or properly <br /> abandon these wells), measure water levels, collect water samples for chloroform analyses, submit a <br /> report describing field activities and sampling results for the second quarter 1997. The wells should <br /> also be analyzed for trichlorofluoromethane (TCFM). TCFM was detected in BC-13 and BC-18 at 2.1 <br /> and 3.3 µg/1, respectively. Although significantly lower than the primary MCL of 150 µg/1, TCFM <br /> concentrations should be monitored. <br /> GP does not recommend any additional investigative work to delineate the chloroform plume either <br /> laterally or vertically. As noted above, the extent of chloroform has not been determined in the area of <br /> BC-20 at the screened interval of BC-13 (75 to 85 feet bgs) where 7.5 µg/l chloroform was detected in <br /> February 1997. The extent of chloroform in this zone should be evaluated after three more quarters of <br /> data are available from BC-13. <br /> By 5 September 1997, please submit an addendum to the evaluation of remedial alternatives. The <br /> addendum shall further evaluate the effectiveness of natural attenuation, ground water pump and treat, <br /> and AS/SVE as discussed above, the cost to implement ground water pump and treat, and methods to <br /> reduce costs associated with AS/SVE. <br /> If you have any questions, you may call me at (916) 255-3048. <br /> POLLYWRY <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> PAL:pal/lsb <br /> cc: San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Stockton <br /> Mr. Todd Miller, Brown and Caldwell, Pleasant Hill <br /> Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources,and <br /> ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.