My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:35:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:29:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' k'q KLEINFELDER <br /> ' of the boring, the ends of the bottom (first) tube covered with Teflon and sealed with tight fitting <br /> plastic caps. An experienced Kleinfelder environmental geologist logged the borings. Lithologic <br /> classification was based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). <br /> ' After the soil samples were collected, they were individually labeled with the Kleinfelder job <br /> number, the sample collection date and time, the employee number of the individual who <br /> performed the sampling, and a unique sample identification number. After labeling, the soil <br /> samples were immediately stored in an iced cooler for transport to Kleinfelder sample storage <br /> ' under chain-of-custody control. At this time, in accordance with the RWQCB Cleanup and <br /> Abatement Order#5-00-717 (C&A Order), analysis of soil samples from the shallow borings has <br /> not been conducted. <br /> After completion, the shallow borings were grouted in accordance with San Joaquin County <br /> ' Public Health Services/Environmental Health Department requirements using a cement based <br /> grout material. <br /> 3.2.2 Deep Soil Borings <br /> ' The two (2) deep soil borings located at the one million gallon storage pond and proposed 72 <br /> million gallon storage pond areas were proposed to be advanced to a maximum depth of 200 to <br /> ' 250 feet below the ground surface or until groundwater is encountered. The deep soil borings <br /> were drilled (until groundwater was encountered) at a maximum depth of 121 feet bgs in TW-1, <br /> and 26 feet bgs in TW-2 (boring IW-2 was located at a substantially lower topographic elevation _ <br /> than TW-1). Soil samples from the plastic (fat) clay, interpreted to be aquitard material were <br /> ' collected for geotechnical analysis and the borings were terminated. Two soil samples were <br /> collected from each deep soil boring for analysis. <br /> The soil borings were drilled with a truck mounted drill rig equipped with 8-inch hollow stem <br /> ' augers. Soil samples were collected every five feet for lithologic classification and potential <br /> laboratory analysis. Samples were collected by advancing the boring to a point immediately <br /> above the desired sampling depth and then driving a Modified California Split-Spoon Sampler, <br /> ' lined with three 2-inch diameter by 6-inch long stainless steel tubes, into the undisturbed soil. <br /> The sampler was then removed from the bottom of the boring. The ends of the bottom (first) <br /> tube were covered with Teflon and sealed with tight fitting plastic caps. <br /> 20-2594-03.004/2011 R447 Page 6 of 16 <br /> Copyright 2001 Kleinfelder, Inc. June 8,2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.