SU0013380 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. Impact 4.1-2: Land use conflicts would occur between proposed urban development and continuing agricultural operations. Mitigation Measure 4.1-2(a): A 1000-foot-wide buffer should be provided along the western boundary of the site. Finding: Changes or alternations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the FEIR to a nonsignificant level. Statement of Fact: This mitigation measure requires a minimum 1000-foot-wide buffer along the western periphery of the project to protect the agricultural lands in Alameda County. The width of this buffer is based on several factors, including prevailing winds from the west and the likelihood of pesticides drifting into the project site from aerial spraying. The applicants have proposed a reduced buffer width of approximately 200 feet based on several different rationales. Their revised land use diagram shows a major arterial being incorporated into this buffer. Conceptual diagrams and supporting text (see Attachment E, and the illustration on the following page) show how a combination of this arterial, berms, landscaped medians, building orientations, etc., will create an effective visual and land use barrier. This narrower width is also premised on the applicant's ability to restrict the agricultural operations in Alameda County to prevent aerial spraying and pesticide application on windy days. Since the applicant has control of the majority of this land, staff feels that the applicant can record the required restrictions against the land. However, this cannot be imposed effectively at the GPA stage. It can be included within the first Development Agreement that will be drafted at the Specific Plan stage. Until the first Development Agreement is approved and recorded, staff recommends that a minimum 500-foot-wide buffer along the project's western boundary be retained. At the time of subsequent environmental review when the Specific Plan is drafted,this mitigation measure could be reevaluated and modified as described above. The 500-foot width is a revision to the EIR preparer's recommended 1000-foot width and has been modified to reflect that same preparer's updated recommendations contained within the EIR prepared for the General Plan 2010. This mitigation measure has been included in Attachment B under New Town Policies. B. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN POLICIES 1. Impact 4.2-1: The project would conflict with many of the County's proposed policies of the Revised Draft General Plan 2010 as well as with policies of the adopted Land Use/Circulation Element of the General Plan. Mitigation Measure 4.2-1(b): The EIR recommends inclusion of the 1000-foot-wide buffer along with other farmland preservation mitigation measures (see attached table for complete text). Conflicts with the 2010 Plan do not need to be addressed as part of this 1995 GPA, since they are and will be addressed as part of the 2010 Plan adoption process. Conflicts with the current Plan have been addressed in the text of the staff report, and staff believes that, with the text amendments proposed in Attachment B, the GPA is consistent. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the FEIR to a nonsignificant level. Attachment C-1 C1-2 (PC: 4-9-92)