Laserfiche WebLink
:::::::...:....::... - <br /> <.:::: : :;::::::::;;:;;<.<>:< :: EXCERPT FROM TABLE 7.1 <br /> :.::.;:.... .....:..::.....:.........:::::......:.::.;:..;..,,...:.::.;.:. <br /> : :.< ; :s:: :>?:'::':::::':::>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::::»:;:>:::;:::>::>:..:.»>.; R I IGA O ING R G M <br /> :.::. .:...::::..::.:::::. .::::::::::::::::..:.::: SUMMARY TABLE FOR MITIGATION TION MONIT R P O RA <br /> >`::>:::;::::;.:::`: i;::::•::::;E: E: is`rE:E:E: ~.-: :...:::::.....:.....:: REQUIRED AT THE GPA STAGE <br /> ,:;;:.;:.;>::.:::......;: ;::>::>::;:;:.... : ; :::i<r .:... MITIGATION MEASURES EQU R <br /> Timing or <br /> Monitoring Person/Agency Frequency of <br /> Impact Mitigation Measure Requirements Responsible Monitoring <br /> 2C)NINQ ANn ONEFiAL PLAN POCICI <br /> 4.2-1: The project would conflict with many of the 4.2-1(b): If the project were approved at the proposed project Refer to mitigation measures In — — <br /> County's proposed policies of the Revised Draft site,the following mitigation measures should be required to Section 4.1 <br /> General Plan 2010 as well as with policies of the protect on-site and adjoining agricultural lands: a 1,000-foot-wide <br /> adopted Land Use/Circulation Element of the buffer at the site's western edge; notification of property owners <br /> General Plan. regarding the County's Right-to-Farm Ordinance; project <br /> contributions towards an agricultural land trust; Inclusion of lands <br /> designated for agricultural use within the project site boundaries; <br /> and redesignation of vacant lands from urban to agricultural use <br /> elsewhere In the County. The County currently has a private, <br /> nonprofit farmland trust which can accept donations to be used <br /> for the permanent protection of farmland. A policy to support this <br /> trust Is Included In the Revised Draft General Plan 2010. <br /> 4.2.1(k): ff a Community Commercial area Is to be located north Review of Final OPA request. SJCCDD GPA <br /> of Byron Road, more Intensive office, residential, and retail uses <br /> should surround this area. Alternatively, only one Community <br /> Commercial district should occur. This district should be located <br /> within the project's central buslness district. <br /> 4.2-2: The project could result In the redirection of 4.2-2: If the proposed project General Plan Amendment were Prior to adoption of the SJCCDD Prior to <br /> growth away from urban and rural communities approved,the County should redesignate County lands within the County's General Plan 2010, adoption of <br /> Identified In the County's General Plan. The Tracy Planning Area. Those lands,which designated for monitoring should occur. General Plan <br /> project's estimated population represents 42.6 development,should be redesignated to agricultural uses until 2010• <br /> percent of the growth projected for the entire Tracy such lands are found necessary to accommodate the projected <br /> Planning Area without the new communities of County growth. Such redesignatlon would be especially <br /> Tracy Hills and New Jerusalem (Figure 4.2-3). necessary H the three new communities within the Tracy Planning <br /> Such redirection of growth could have significant Area were approved. Significant acreages on the west, east, and <br /> fiscal ramifications for existing urban and rural south sides of the City of Tracy are shown in the County General <br /> communities. Plan 2010 as area for urban uses. Those areas,which are outside <br /> the City's existing Sphere of Influence, should be the first areas to <br /> be redesignated to agricultural uses. <br /> Mitigation Measures -2- ER-91-1/GP-89-11 <br />