SU0013380 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXCERPT FROM TABLE 7.1 TABLE FOR MITIGATION.MONITORING PROGRAM ............... :.::•»>> "'""" MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AT THE GPA STAGE Timing or Monitoring Person/Agency Frequency of Impact Mitigation Measure Requirements Responsible Monitoring WATER SUPPLY 4.4.1-4: The projected available supply of water to 4.4.1-4(d): Overall water demand could be reduced by a Review at GAA,-or SP stage 10 SJCCDD SP ar-012A the project alts (8,125 AF per year) Is less than the reduction In project density. This mitigation measure would only determine H subsequent OPA project demand (10,391 AF per year) and could be needed M other strategies did not reduce total water demand to will be required. result In an Inadequate water supply for the 8,125 AF/year or lower. A subsequent GPA could be required project. ft groundwater resources were available to reflect required lower densities. and developed, overdrafting of local groundwater resources could occur. VISUAL QUALI711'. 4.8-1: The proposed project would replace a 4.8-1(a): A major visual setback should be provided to maintain Review of final GPA request and SJCCDD GPA and SP 4,667-acre agricultural portion of San Joaquin an agricultural gateway to San Joaquin County for motorists during development of Specific County with a built environment, and would driving along 1-205. Development south of Grant Line Road could Plan. significantly after the existing rural visual quality of be limited to a band extending approximately 3,000 feet south of the she as seen from local roads. the road (Figure 4.8-10). Development wfthin this band should also be screened by a continuous row of evergreen trees at the southern end of the development. A permanent open space easement could be acquired to protect this southern portion of the project site that would be visible from 1-205 (Figure 4.8-10). This development setback would also have the added benefit of reducing noise Impacts from 1-205. The applicant could purchase a conservation easement (i.e.,voluntary restriction of land use to agricultural purposes) using the San Joaquin Open Space and Farmland Trust The land could remain in private ownership and agricultural production,with deed restrictions to prevent future development POPULATION,HOUSING,AND EMPLOYMENT 4.11-4: The proposed project would capture 4.114: The reduction of population and employment growth In None necessary. — — demand for some residential and nonresidential Tracy that results from Implementation of the proposed project land uses that would otherwise go to the City of cannot be mitigated unless the project Is denied, or ft project Tracy. becomes part of the City of Tracy. Mitigation Measures -3. ER-91-1/GP-89-11