Laserfiche WebLink
Did the notification contain the primary <br />exporter's MUM, address, Identification Number, <br />and signature? <br />Did the nocation also contain, by consignee, <br />for each HW type, the following information: <br />(66262.53 (b) ] <br />-A description of the Hw, California HW Code <br />Number, the U -S- DOT shipping name, hazard class <br />and UN/NA number (per 40 CFR 171-177)? <br />qhe estimated frequency and tn)e span of <br />aqportation? <br />-The estn-ated total qL=tlty-> <br />-All points of it and departure from each <br />foreign country the HW will pass through? <br />-How the waste will be traxLsported (type of <br />vehicles and containers)? <br />-A description of how the waste will be treated, <br />stored, or disposed of in the receiving country? <br />- The name and site address of the foreign <br />consignee (s) ? <br />-JIhe ruum of each country the HW will pass <br />through, for how long it will remain there, and <br />how it will be handled dur' that time,> <br />Was the export notification for RcRA Hw sent to: <br />Office Of International Actives (A-106) EPA, <br />401 M St. SW.1 Washington DC 20460? (66262.53(c)]_ <br />"Tas the export notification (or a copy if a <br />RCRA HW) sent to: Department of Health Services, <br />Toxic Substances Control Program, Manifest Unit, <br />P.O. Box 942732, Sacramento, CA 94234-7320? <br />(66262.53 (c) ] <br />Has the Primary exporter not shipped waste until <br />the notification was correct and an EPA <br />Acknowledgment of Consent'was received? <br />[66262.3O <br />Revised 7/15/91 Page 32 <br />