COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

been corrected. Mr. Backus called and spoke with Ms. Marie Jordan of California Fuel Supply, Inc., which owns the Country Club 76 Gas Station. She asked Mr. Backus to send all information to Mr. Dave Hinds, also of California Fuel Supply, Inc., by fax. Later that day, Mr. Hinds stopped by the EHD office and submitted a packet of documents that included a return to compliance certification, a statement that the previous alarms were caused by programming issues of the monitoring panel and that Central Petroleum Maintenance reprogrammed the monitoring panel on February 19, 2009, a log of employee training by the designated operator, service receipts from Central Petroleum Maintenance dated February 6, 18, and 20, 2009, current financial responsibility documents, and a designated operator statement (Attachment 6). Mr. Backus gave Mr. Hinds blank monitoring and response plans, and facility and tank forms and asked that he complete and submit them. Mr. Backus also reminded Mr. Hinds to schedule the annual monitoring system certification. On April 27, 2009, Mr. Backus called Mr. Hinds and told him that a permit application was required if Central Petroleum Maintenance had reprogrammed the monitoring panel in February 2009. Mr. Backus emailed a copy of the permit application to Mr. Hinds. On May 19, 2009, Mr. Backus witnessed the monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing, all performed five months late. The monitoring plan was incorrect and incomplete, and the UST — facility and UST — tank forms were on outdated forms. The 91 -octane fill sump contained three gallons of liquid and the sensor was sifting on a high point of the top of the tank and not located at the lowest point to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. The 87 -octane fill sump sensor was also located in a similar manner, though Mr. Backus did not note it in the report. Photos were taken of these two sumps (Attachment 7). The 87 -octane tank annular sensor and the 91 -octane product piping smart liquid sensor failed a functionality test. Mr. Backus left an inspection report on site (Attachment 8). i I N I• I - oil- 0 0 Garrett Backus, Senior REHS 600 E. Main Street Stockton, CA 95202 (209) 468-2986 work phone gbackus@sjcehd.com 61WORGiZe • Me - David Hinds, Business Development M (9 25) 979-0467 K