Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 <br />E <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br />Page of <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br />X <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested <br />Test Method Developed By: <br />❑ Sump Manufacturer <br />❑ Other (Spec) <br />❑ Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />Test Method Used: <br />❑ Pressure <br />❑ Other (Spec) <br />❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br />Test Equipment Used: <br />Diameter: <br />Fill Sump # <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br />-Sump <br />Depth: <br />-Sump <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Piping Penetration: <br />-Highest <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />-testing: <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />Material: <br />-Sump <br />Wait time between applying <br />water and starting test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading (RI): <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />in Reading RF -RI : <br />-Change <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Test Result- <br />Pass _ 0 Fail <br />Pass © Fail Pass ❑ Fail " ©Pais 0 Fail <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />Yes ❑ No <br />Yes ❑ No Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />nal after testin <br />verified functio? <br />Yes ❑ No 11 NA <br />Yes Ll No 11 NA Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No F1 NA <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />