My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOSPITAL
>
500
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231614
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 1:54:59 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:50:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231614
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000086
FACILITY_NAME
San Joaquin General Hospital
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HOSPITAL
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
French Camp
Zip
95231
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
500 W Hospital Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231614_500 W HOSPITAL_2013-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Complete the following cheeky: <br />SEP 13 2016 <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No" <br />Is the visual alarm operaYronal? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No" <br />Were all sensor's installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper <br />operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />if alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) operational? <br />® N/A <br />❑ Yes <br />13 No* <br />For pressurizedpiping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down If the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br />® N/A <br />falls to operate,or is If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check aN that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench <br />Sensors serser Containment connected? <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks AW sensor failureldisconnectior? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No" <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no mechanical overfill prevention valve is <br />® NIA <br />Installed),warringWorm visible and audible at the tank 811 point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity <br />does �®alarm trigger? <br />❑ Yes <br />® No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name <br />and model for all replacement parts In Section E, below. <br />❑Yes" <br />® No <br />Was liquid found Insde any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product; ❑ Waren. 9 yes, describe causes In Section E, below. <br />® Yes <br />❑ Pio' <br />Was monitoring system -up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />® Yes <br />❑ No" <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br />In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.