My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232224
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2021 10:42:38 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0232224
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232224_3250 W HAMMER_1999-2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aug 11 06 03:34p Mike Dotten 209-533-2650 p.3 <br /> Facility: Hammer 1-5 Arco <br /> D. Results of TestinglServicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Com tete the following checklist:* <br /> 0 Yes 10 No* is the audible aban 2pErational? []Outside Audible Alum? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* is the visual alarm erational? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* Is the Eint function operational? 0 Not installed. <br /> 0 Yes [:] No* Were all sensors visual!X jM2ecte4 functionally tested,and confirmed onal? <br /> Yes f7 No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment aid positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proRer operation? <br /> -C]Yes L]Ne If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> [D N/A operational? <br /> 2 Yes El No* For pressurized piping system, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> L]N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 0 Sump Sensors; El Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm pTitive shut-down due to leaks and sensor flailureldisconnection? D Yes; [I No. <br /> [3 Yes L]No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (Le. no <br /> N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alum visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating p=ly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trif&e&. <br /> ❑ Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? if yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check ail that apply) <br /> 0 Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑No* Was moni 2system set-up reviewed to ensure pERUgr E!tiM?Attach set M LepR!!N if livable <br /> JZYes I []No* jlsall mo2t2!j5equi ment=rational pEman uhgtmesEecifications? <br /> *in Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: A little clear water was Left over from the Secondary Containment testing. We removed it into the wet <br /> barrel that was on site. <br /> Page 2 of 3 O301 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.