My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232224
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2021 10:42:38 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0232224
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232224_3250 W HAMMER_1999-2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 25 06 03:16p Mike Dotten 209-533-2650 p.2 <br /> 1 <br /> Facility: Hammer 1-5 Arco <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Cam lets the following checklist: <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm o erational? ❑Outside Audible Alarm? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarmoperational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* is the Rrint function operational? ❑Not installed. <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually ins ected,functionally tested,and confirmed o rational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper o erasion? <br /> ❑Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> ® NIA operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump Sensors; ❑Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑Yes ❑No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ®NIA mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and operating ro eri ? If so,at what pment of tank ea aci does the alarm trigger? <br /> ❑Yes* ®No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced i <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement Earts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes* ®No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ®Yes ❑No* Was monitorin system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ®Yes ❑No* jjsA monitorina equipment o rational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: No Deficiencies. <br /> Page 2 of 3 03/0l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.