Laserfiche WebLink
From ; BLUE LINE TECHN 6 <br />IES 530 671 5208 0l 2003 18.10 #289 P , 002/005 <br />T E C H N O L 0 Q I E g <br />Chemical Resistance Analysis <br />Summary; <br />In this study it was our objective to look at the materials used in most of the fittings we are in the potroloum <br />market currcndy. It was *iorvod that there are some significant problems with most of the entry fittings <br />used in the petroleum fitlirtgs market. Two problems aro most slgnlficant, <br />It was determined in our study that Natural and Nitrile Rubber elastomers generally have good chemical <br />and water resistance but poor resistance to the deteriorating offocts of ozone and aromatic hydrocarbons, <br />Nitrile tubber is heavily used in this application and this ozone issue is the reason we sea such widespread <br />failure in boots constructed of this type of material. Wo looked at both the effects of immorsion Posts as <br />well as ozone exposure and found that there really aren't any Nitrile rubber formulations that demonstrate a <br />good resistance to ozone or hydrocarbons. <br />The socond major issue is the effects of water on Estano 58300 elastomor. Though each different olastomor <br />demonstrates differing propertlos, the general effect is a poor resistance to water especially when the <br />temperature is raised to 100 degrees F. In general we found that polyurethanes were the best choice for this <br />application duo to there rosl;tance to chemicals, water, ozone, and hydrocarbons, but in the case of Estano <br />the potentisd effects of water were significant as demonstrated in our support material. <br />It was important in doing this evaluation that wo look closely at the major causes of the failures wo have <br />icon and at the overall general physical property changes that occurred to those various materials when <br />exposed to a variety of different fuels and conditions, In general if we observed a significant physical <br />property chango in the material after exposure then we concluded that the material was likely to suffer <br />degradation as a result of long terra exposure to water, fuels, and ozone. Nitrilo, AJcryn, and Bstane all <br />demonstrated weaknesses in some areas, It is also important to point out that physical property loss seems <br />to be accelerated once there begins to be some change caused in the material, making it difficult to pinpoint <br />the exact causes, <br />Our recommendation is that we use. Pollothane for all Bluellne fittings, This is the only product family that <br />demonstrated strong resistwice to physical property change after exposure to Nels and water as well as <br />having the ozone and hydrocarbon resistance inherent in most of the urethane family of elastomers, <br />Although the data we compiled on the Follothane 2102.was excellent, Dow Chemical recommends that we <br />use their latest Pellethane technology (2355.75) as it has additionally improved upon its water and fuel <br />resistanco properties, It has also proven this point in our in house tasting, <br />Blueline Technologies Confidential 6/5/02 <br />