Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />From : BLUE LINE TECHNO ' ES 530 671 5208 01/""0003 18:10 #289 P-002/005 <br />e L t <br />t c # K t�. glxli'2i(1� <br />l <br />T E C N N O Eur 0 Q I E S. <br />Chemical Resistance Analysis <br />summary: <br />In this study it was our objective to look at the materials used in most of the fittings we see in the petroleum <br />market currently. It was observed that there are some significant problems with most of the entry fittings <br />used in the petroleum fittings market. Two problems are most significant. <br />It was determined in our study that Natural and Nitrile Rubber elastomers generally have good chemical <br />and water resistance but poor resistance to the deteriorating effects of ozone and aromatic hydrocarbons, <br />Nitrile rubber is heavily used in this application and this ozone issue is the reason we see such widespread <br />failure in boots constructed of this type of material, We looked at both the effects of immorsion tests as <br />well as ozone exposure and found that there really aren't any Nitrile rubber formulations that demonstrate a <br />good resistance to ozone or.hydrocarbons. <br />The second major issue is the effects of water on Estano 58300 elastomer. Though each different elastomer <br />demonstrates differing properties, the general effect is a poor resistance to water especially when the <br />temperature is raised to 100 degrees F. In general we found that polyurethanes were the best choice for this <br />application due to there roslatance to chemicals, water, ozone, and hydrocarbons, but in the case of Estane <br />the potential effects of water ware significant as demonstrated in our support material. <br />It was Important in doing this evaluation that we look closely at the major causes of the failures we have <br />seen and at the overall general physical property changes that occurred to these various materials when <br />exposed to a variety of different fuels and conditions, In general if we observed a significant physical <br />property change in the material after exposure then we concluded that the material was likely to suffor <br />degradation as a result of long term exposure to water, fuels, and ozone. Nitrilo, A.lcryn, and Estane all <br />demonstrated weaknesses in some areas. It is also Important to point out that physical property loss seems <br />to be accelerated once there begins to be some change caused in the material, making it difficult to pinpoint <br />the exact causes. <br />Our recommendation is that we use. Pellethans for all Bluslins fittings, Ilia is the only product famlly that <br />demonstrated strong resistance to physical property change after exposure to fuels end water as well as <br />having the ozone and hydrocarbon resistance inherent in most of the urethane family of elastomers, <br />Although the data we compiled on the Pollethane 2102.was excellent, Dow Chemical reconunends that we <br />use their latest Pellethane technology (2355-75) as It has additionally improved upon its water and fuel <br />resistance properties, It has also proven this point in our in house testing, <br />Blueline Technologies Confidential 6/5/02 <br />