Laserfiche WebLink
". I %. 0 <br /> SWRCB,January 2002 Page 6 of-7 <br /> 8. FELL RISER CONTAM[E1 SUMEP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Eui ped Witli Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> est Method Developed By: 0 Sump Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> 0 Other(Spew) <br /> Test Me Used: ❑Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Spec) 'z <br /> Test Equipment Use Equipment Resolutio <br /> Fill Sump# All'sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# <br /> Sump Diameter: <br /> Sump Depth: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: <br /> Height-from Tank Top to Lowest <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to <br /> testin : <br /> Portion of S!Lmp Tested <br /> Sump Material: <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and <br /> start!!! test: <br /> Test Start Time: <br /> initial Reading(R. <br /> Test End Time: <br /> Final Reading F <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading RF-RI): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or C a: <br /> Test Result: (J ❑ <br /> Pass Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑"Fail ass Q.Fail <br /> is there a sensor in tli ump? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No ❑ 0 No <br /> Does the-sensor al when <br /> either product o ater is ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 ❑NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was senso emoved for-testing? 0 Yes 0 No. DNA ❑Yes• 0 No- ❑NA D Yes ❑No- DNA, 0 Yes- D No bNA, <br /> Was sens r properly replaced and ❑yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes 0 No DNA 0 Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No DNA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />