COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

replacing the diesel spill container, 91-octane leak detector, and 91-octane annular sensor (Attachment 93). On October 23, 2006, certification of financial responsibility, updated UST Tank forms, and the return to compliance certification were submitted (Attachment 94). On October 27, 2006, Mr. Ng went to West Lane Chevron to verify the testing of the diesel, 87- and 91-octane spill containers, as well as the 91-octane annular sensor and leak detector and verified measurements of the 87-and 91-octane drop tubes (Attachment 95). On October 8, 2007, Mr. von Floe performed a routine UST inspection, a routine hazardous waste inspection, and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing. During the LIST inspection, Mr. von Floe found that current financial responsibility documents had not been submitted to the EHD, and monitoring and response plans had not been submitted to the EHD for approval. Liquid was found in all three fill sumps. Records of employee training by the designated operator were not found on site. The 87-octane and diesel leak detectors failed a three gallon per hour leak test and the 87-octane spill container failed a one hour hydrostatic test. An inspection report was left on site (Attachment 96) and a monitoring system certification test report was submitted to the EHD (Attachment 97). During the routine hazardous waste inspection, Mr. von Floe noted repeat violations that included the lack of a valid EPA identification number to manage hazardous waste and copies of disposal manifests and modified emergency information were not found on site. Mr. von Floe also found two 55-gallon drums, two 30-gallon drums, and one 25-gallon drum, all containing hazardous waste, that were stored on site longer than 180 days. Three empty poly drums that held hazardous materials were not marked with the date they were emptied. An inspection report was left on site(Attachment 98). Copies of both inspection reports and photos taken were faxed to Mr. Saini the following day and photos taken during the inspection were emailed to Mr. Singh on October 19, 2007. On October 12, 2007, a permit application, SR0052275, was submitted by Elite IV to replace the two failed leak detectors. The permit application did not include a scope of work for the failed spill container. Mr. von Floe called Elite IV, who stated they intended to include it on the application but forgot. Mr. von Floe approved the permit application on October 16, 2007 (Attachment 99). On October 29, 2007, Mr. von Floe was on site to witness testing of the replaced 87-octane and diesel leak detectors, which functioned normally. Mr. von Floe also witnessed the testing of the repaired 87-octane spill container and found that it did not hold five gallons. Mr. von Floe also noticed that the liquid in all three fill sumps still had not been removed. The service technician began to pump out the liquid and the pump clogged up. Mr. von Floe requested that another inspection should be scheduled once all of the repairs were complete(Attachment 100). On October 30, 2007, current financial responsibility documents and copies of the manifests for the removal of one drum of hazardous waste and the empty contaminated containers were submitted (Attachment 101). On November 5, 2007, Mr. von Floe spoke with Mr. Singh regarding the missing documentation for both inspections. Mr. Singh faxed over a copy of the monitoring and response plans. The monitoring plan needed to have corrections made, so Mr. von Floe called Mr. Singh and discussed all of the items that needed to be corrected. Mr. Singh said he will fax over the 13