COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 0 corrected monitoring and response plans later. On November 6, 2007, Mr. von Flue was on site to verify the five-gallon capacity and testing of the 7-octane spill container. The drop tube had to be shortened to accommodate the riser being shortened so the spill container could hold five gallons. The drop tube was measured and verified that it met the overfill requirement (Attachment 102). Mr. von Flue also verified all three fill sumps were free of liquid. Mr. Singh was also on site and provided Mr. von Flue with the following documents: the updated monitoring and response plans, which Mr. von Flue approved, records of employee training by the designated operator, copy of the manifest for the removal of the remaining hazardous waste, corrective actions statement, hazardous waste emergency information, and a completed application for an EPA identification number (Attachment 103). Mr. von Flue told Mr. Singh that copies of all hazardous waste receipts and receipts for disposing of the contents of the oil water separator for the car wash were still lacking. A test report was submitted to the EHD on November 14, 2007 (Attachment 104). On December 4, 2007, Mr. von Flue received a voice mail message from Mr. Singh to call him back. Mr. von Flue returned Mr. Singh's call and spoke with him regarding the copies of hazardous waste receipts and receipts for disposing of the contents of the oil water separator for the car wash. Mr. Singh stated that he did not have any receipts for any of the items that Mr. von Flue requested. On September 19, 2008, a permit application, 50055429, was submitted by Elite IV to replace the drop tube in the 7-octane tank. Mr. Backus approved this permit on September 22, 2008. On October 27, 2008, Elite IV submitted request to use a different brand of drop tube. Mr. Backus approved this on November 3, 2008 (Attachment 105). On November 6, 2008, Mr. Backus performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 106) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing. During the inspection, Mr. Backus found diesel leaking from piping in UDC sumps 1/ and 7/8, and the annular sensor in the diesel tank was not located to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. The sensor was not in alarm prior to testing, but as it was being removed for testing, Mr. Backus noticed the cord was wet with what appeared to be water. The sensor tested ok, but when the service technician replaced the sensor into the proper location in the tank annular, it went into alarm, indicating the presence of liquid. During the review of the facility's files, Mr. Backus found that secondary containment testing was due by July 2008 and had not been done and current financial responsibility documents were not submitted to the EHD. There were no records to explain two alarms that occurred in the last year, and the October 2008 designated operator inspection report was not available for review. On November 12, 2008, Elite IV submitted a revised scope of work for permit S0055429 to add the replacement of the annular sensor and the spill container drain valve in the 7-octane tank. Mr. Backus approved this on November 13, 2008 (Attachment 107). On December 3, 2008, a monitoring system test report for testing on November 6, 2008, was submitted (Attachment 108). Under the "Comments" section was written, "Unable to test and confirm proper functionality of Tank 91 WILD due to non-operating STP," though a box above was checked indicating all leak detectors passed. Mr. Backus called the testing company, EPIC, and spoke with Mr. Nik Zagorov who stated that the comment was an error and he would resubmit the report. A revised report was never submitted. 14