SU0000631 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Development Committee -2- MS-96-8 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING: The General Plan designation for the segment between State Route 4 and Escalon-Bellota Road is Commercial Rural Service (C/RS) . The segment between Escalon-Bellota Road and Little John' s Creek is designated as Rural Residential (R/R) . The zoning, however, for the segment between State Route 4 and Escalon-Bellota Road is shown as General Agriculture, 40-acre minimum parcel size (AG- 40) . In reviewing this issue with advanced planning staff, it has been determined that this will be corrected administratively and shown as Rural Service Commercial (C-RS) . The segment between Escalon-Bellota Road and Escalon-Bellota Creek is zoned Rural Residential (R-R) . The designated remainder parcel is General Agricultural A/G on the General Plan and zoned General Agriculture, 40-acre minimum parcel size (AG-40) . The abandoned railroad right-of-way is 100 feet wide. The minimum frontage width for a parcel and rural residential zone is 150 feet. The rural residential parcel is at a high skew with Escalon-Bellota Road and although not dimensioned, scales approximately 190± at the setback line. SERVICES: Parcels 1 and 2 are both less than two acres. Public water and terminal drainage will, therefore, be required at the time of development. Relative to water, there is a letter from the Farmington Water Company dated March 18, 1996 on file, that states the Farmington Water Company is able to and will furnish water to both parcels. Drainage, for the area of town situated in the southeast quadrant of State Route 4 and Escalon-Bellota Road, is provided by two catch basins in Elm Street. The drainage is collected and discharged along a ditch system within the abandoned railroad right-of-way to Little John' s Creek. Public Works will require a drainage easement on Parcel 2 . ACCESS/ROADS: Public Works has determined that Escalon-Bellota Road should not be lowered where it crosses the abandoned railroad right-of-way. This project does not justify the expense and lowering the road may affect the flood elevations. Caltrans has also reviewed this project and determined they have no requirements (Chris Sayre telephone communication on 5-7-96) .