Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> January 6, 1995 <br /> Kathleen Gayner Deutsch <br /> 13 65 5 Dunbar Road 3� <br /> Dundee, Mi, 48131 �! <br /> (313) 529-5116 <br /> Mr. Ronald Senner <br /> A r,� 1 � X995 <br /> Unocal Real Estate Division ENVIROiVMENTAL H[AETH <br /> Unocal Corporation PERMITISERV)CES <br /> 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 440, <br /> P.O. Box 5155 <br /> r <br /> San Ramon, CA. 94583 <br /> Re: Site Remediation Unocal SS#6348, Tracy, CA, <br /> Dear Mr. Senner; <br /> I <br /> I am enclosing a copies of correspondence from Mr. Harlin Knoll, (SJCPHS), to Mr. <br /> Ralston of your office, and from Ms. Lori Casias, (SWRCB), regarding the outcome of <br /> the Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting of December 14, 1994. <br /> You will clearly note from the content of these letters that you are required to undertake <br /> additional on-site soils and groundwater investigation and submit further, updated analyses <br /> of your prior findings for SJCPHS evaluation. I draw your attention to paragraphs 3&4 of <br /> Mr. Knoll's letter, which are self explanatory. Of particular interest is the SJCPHS <br /> requirement that " The current groundwater condition in the backfilled area and east of <br /> soil sample SW-I 1 need(ed)to be evaluated". Ms. Casias also states "that further site <br /> assessment needs to be conducted before this site can be considered for closure." <br /> This particular area should have been thoroughly investigated when the USTs were pulled <br /> some (2)two years ago. The fact that this omission occured, is, in my opinion, a grossly <br /> negligent oversight on Unocal's behalf. Perhaps now with the full force of the TRC <br /> mandate, you will see fit to examine the area east of SW-I I at the old UST site (ie. the <br /> It lot") and therefore correct the limited scope of your ongoing site mitigation. It <br /> also appears that you have additional soils analyses at PL-7, SW-7 and SW-11. Clearly <br /> much has to be done before SJCPHS and the California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> are prepared to consider this site ready for closure! <br /> This unnecessary re-opening of the site mitigation process, begun in late 1991, is now, <br /> with its inherent delays and uncertain, extended time frame, having a definitely negative <br /> affect on the marketability of our property. After (3) three years of ongoing investigation <br />