Laserfiche WebLink
and reportingon detection, assessrncnt and clean-up <br /> underground tank leaks . 1t should b(r no here that aI <br /> e <br /> excavation, stock piling of spoil , sampling for passible <br /> contarninat inn and other tcchnr 1959+ eretlnci then+�perr fore edab)'snor <br /> the GTI report and December , rforined and the data <br /> + itnessed by Huntes- & Associates . The `+'ork pe eriod, Were both <br /> discussed herein, collected Burin€; e sarribles collected and the <br /> under the direction of JTO. All aodl_de b`, pcanonie Environmental <br /> -inaIyIical tests run California, a California 1�H5 <br /> Services (CES) of Stockton, ua11t <br /> certified laboratory. CES routinely tnllous in-house > <br /> Assurance Guides and keeps Chain-Of -Custody forms for al ! sanrplc <br /> All collections of soil scjnples for <br /> collecting and testing. ,were witnessed b}. <br /> testing, with reprr_sentatives5df <br /> oThene exccpiion, <br /> the Department of Health Services (or its antecedent , <br /> Joaquin Local Health District ) . <br /> presented herein regarding operatio <br /> The documentationein <br /> s during <br /> the period of tl25, 199,8 to December 13, 1959 ( the date of the <br /> writers first visit to the Winery _Site) were supplied by the Jim <br /> Thorpe Oil Copano erationsathatrdtookeplaceat hetheCf`irerldrychain-ofi <br /> the excavatr g p CES, their lab reports and their field <br /> custody forms kept bythe <br /> collection orders , all substantiate that tate u'o9S9do��asdudone as <br /> period of tilay 25, 1988 and December 13, <br /> discussed herein. Hunter L11 Associates aCCepOil hCompany rand%, base <br /> Jim work done during that Period by <br /> their work herein on that prernise. <br /> In tephone discussions with Darlene Reuss, BHS, <br /> In <br /> le <br /> Jan. 5 , 199Q, <br /> ale informally agreed that this report would commence at the <br /> so <br /> point of termination of stted <br /> the GTI report • T1s. Reuss <br /> n1955, asa <br /> are- <br /> that the Tri -Regionalat <br /> for report format <br /> should be the ions <br /> vised Rpri1 3, 1959 , <br /> and for reg <br /> ui.rements %vhenever questions arise. <br /> Neither orfitllve t`he gRidReglonalsGuutied <br /> eei lhien <br /> esiandl3Theu53LHDrRepoort- <br /> used prese , , hic the work <br /> ing Requirements anddFormal,- i It+ail ] be~ . oposed. -The reports <br /> done subsequently HD forma of ,A Preliminary Report" <br /> noted above fit into the art of a�,Site Assessment Report". <br /> and could be inferred the o bee p <br /> This Ceport doassessestthesetactiveties�andatriescuorestablishsince �ha <br /> GTI Report , ' s status. It <br /> continuity between the appendedionalmRequiremenos3as a Sail Con- <br /> also should fulfill the Tri g <br /> lamination Workplan (SCW) <br />