Laserfiche WebLink
1DDE3,DU11 NO. 2 <br /> SITE ASSESSMENT FEFORT <br /> FORnEF TSC W ] ERY SITE <br /> 1 WEST TURN .it ROAD, LODI, CA <br /> I NTRODUCT1011 <br /> On February 1, 1990, the repert Assessment 1 Westt, <br /> Update and T,�ort: Stat Former IS� Winery Site, <br /> Turner Rd. , Lodi , C;%," was submitted 4o San .7oaquin County, <br /> Department of pubjlic health Services, Environmental Health <br /> Division. <br /> On April15, 1999, ar: adc.'_i,sclu;n to tiy«t repurc was su}�nitted <br /> as above, which addend'.:m Slf:,:w,ri ::-d y3Sr.5 CC:l;�ietG ��.ftfr <br /> the 'February 1 , 1990 report test rE su lts f rnrn three <br /> ;nar.itcring wells were included . These data Kers not done to <br /> testing standards as szgaested in the Tri-P:!9ional <br /> c :trent �.,stin, a <br /> Recommendations, even though Cavicn e Environmental , <br /> certified testing laboratory, had lir-en instrucedto do s <br /> cerci data were presented as received and the discrepancy <br /> Tesea S was pointed out <br /> no.k noted by Hunter arc r.$SCcs • until it <br /> anrertal Heald Staff. <br /> by Ent'ir <br /> test -nethods ::ere checl_ed with `_t e Carionie <br /> data daa and t g <br /> � 1 samples could not be retests <br /> Environmental Services and the <br /> _d szd <br /> owing to the time thet h pas �. <br /> ' the ,ddendum Report that the <br /> A1_o it had been noted �n <br /> a presented should be viewed with care be- <br /> ti•:atEr table datCaL=e they did not :catch earlier data. <br /> After discussions "rete 'geld �iti� Er,�rironsriertal Health Staff, <br /> were made to resurv_y the nonitcring well <br /> a � n1 <br /> preprrat"Ons retest eater from the 3 MTN- <br /> heads and to res ample and to <br /> itorin? wells. Also, <br /> the EHD requested lj . Additional map <br /> work, 2) . Discussion of drainage to the pit of fora). on <br /> Show <br /> daring the Period when it was open �o -�5' , <br /> 3 <br /> :•:stet <br /> i:i:etc this Dit water was diSpCSeG1 Oi l t0 ponds, <br /> h Show on a 3-dir,iensional projection' the l;;catio} s of Soil � <br /> where some slig}st htidrocarban contamination <br /> Eorir_os 3 and TeC'.1nO1Vg;r report <br /> had ba en .toted in th Or1t1liSl a--'o'�=:7),an` Discuss the <br /> appended to e,-iginal of this repsrfrom¢tlles3 monitoring <br /> disposal of the bore hole cutting <br /> wells and 5 soil boring holes. <br /> he following report attempts to answer all of these <br /> T <br /> T estions . it should tie noted that the three dimensional <br />. <br /> pro jecticri was--done_to--tl]e--be - fthe hhlsOrsalblxmapy-data;.._..---._ <br /> it only approl:lmates a true projection.lies, pits and concrete <br /> such as locations of various spoil p <br /> rubble are approximations only and do not represent surveyed <br /> locations. T17e pit dug for removaTve�ed047 odatainated spot . <br /> its partial refilling are from }' <br /> 1 <br /> i IN <br />