Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> contamination and the presence of groundwater Once groundwater was encountered, the <br /> hydropunch sampler was attached to the drive rod and driven into the formation for <br /> obtaining a discrete water sample The limited access direct push rig was unable to core <br /> much below the 70 foot depth An auger rig was then used for the deeper cores <br /> California Split Spoon (CSS) samplers were driven without liners in three foot intervals <br /> and then retrieved The boring was then augered advanced to the cored depth, and then a <br /> CSS sampler was again driven to obtain soil cores This coring, augering method <br /> advanced to the total depth of the hole If a water bearing formation was encountered, a <br /> hydropunch sampler was then driven into the water bearing zone for the recovery of <br /> water samples <br /> HYDROPUNCH WATER SAMPLING METHOD <br /> The borings or direct push probe holes were advanced to within three feet of the interval <br /> for water sampling The drilling assembly was removed and the hydropunch attached to <br /> a drill rod that pushed the hydropunch to the desired sampling depth The hyropunch was <br /> connected to the drive point Once the sample depth was achieved, the drive rods (1 75 <br /> inch diameter hollow rods) were retracted, exposing the filter screen and allowing <br /> groundwater infiltration A small diameter bailer was used to collect groundwater <br /> samples through the hollow rod Three hydropunch samples failed at the following core <br /> hole intervals due to mud clogging the inner rod, T3-2 at the 80 to 82 75 and 86 to 89 <br /> foot intervals and at T3-3 from the 81 to 82 foot interval <br /> SAMPLE PRESERVATION <br /> Soil samples collected from the direct push continuous core boreholes were preserved by <br /> covering the acrylic sample sleeve ends with plastic caps Soil samples collected from <br /> the auger/CSS drilling were first field screened with a PID containing a 10 6 ev bulb <br /> The highest response interval within the CSS was then sleeved with a 2 inch diameter by <br /> 3 inch length stainless steel sleeve and then capped with Teflon and plastic end caps <br /> Each sample sleeve (acrylic or stainless steel) was labeled with the site name, date, time, <br /> sample location, and analyses to be performed Each labeled soil sample was placed in a <br /> separate zip lock bag, deposited in an ice chest, and cooled to 4°C <br /> The water samples collected from the first water bearing zone or hydropunch sampler <br /> were decanted from the mini bailer into and completely filling three (no headspace) 40 cc <br /> VOAs that contain HCI as a preservative The VOAs were then capped with teflon <br /> septum caps, labeled with the site name, date, time, sample location, and analyses to be <br /> performed Each labeled water sample was placed in individual zip lock bags prior to <br /> deposit into an ice chest, and cooled to 40C The samples and accompanying chain-of- <br /> custody documentation were delivered to a California State certified analytical <br /> laboratory <br /> 5 ARC Pump, ASSESSMENT 2006 <br />