Laserfiche WebLink
04 April 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0505 <br />' Page 2 of 5 <br /> Field activities were performed in accordance with guidelines for investigation of underground <br /> storage tank (UST) sites and sampling ground water rnonitonng wells established by the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB) and by the San Joaquin County <br />' Public Health Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) <br />' 2 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> Ground water sampling of the on-site wells was conducted on 01 March 2001 For the sampling <br /> event, a Solmst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in the eight <br /> monitoring wells relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water elevations and gradient <br /> were determined from these data (Table 1) <br /> After S�' <br /> depth to groundwater measurements, a rnmunum of 3 casing-water volumes was purged from <br /> P <br /> each well to be sampled using a PVC submersible two-stage pump Approximately six to twenty- <br /> four gallons of water were removed from wells MW-1 through MW-8 Temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity of purged ground water were measured at 1-to 4-gallon intervals using a Oakton water <br /> • analyzer The field data and field sheets are included in Appendix A Purged water was temporarily <br />' stored on-site in 55-gallon DOT-approved H-17 storage drums pending proper disposal Following <br /> purging, the depth to ground water was measured to ensure that a minimum of 80% well-volume <br /> recharge had been achieved prior to sampling <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> A water sample was collected from each well using a new, clean, disposable plastic bailer <br /> I Immediately upon retrieval,the samples were transferred into three 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials <br /> containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The samples were logged on a <br /> chaui-of=custody form, stored in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified <br /> laboratory The ground water samples were analyzed for <br />' • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br />' in accordance with EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Oxygenated compounds di-isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE), methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME),tertiary butanol(TBA),and <br />' methanol, ethanol, ethyldibronnde (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance <br /> with EPA Method 8260-Modified, respectively <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />