My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007370 CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
30350
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540424
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007370 CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 12:16:10 PM
Creation date
6/11/2020 12:06:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007370 CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0540424
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023098
FACILITY_NAME
RMC PACIFIC MATERIALS - T0607700371
STREET_NUMBER
30350
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TRACY
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
30350 S TRACY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> IPleasanton, California Proper chain-of-custody protocol was maintained at all <br /> . times The samples were analyzed by EPA method 8015M for diesel range <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-diesel) and by EPA method 8021 B for benzene, <br /> toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX) <br /> IWELL DEVELOPMENT& GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROTOCOL <br /> On June 14, an attempt was made by the driller to develop the two wells in order <br /> to improve hydraulic continuity with the native formation An airlift method was tried but <br /> it proved unsuccessful due to the very low ratio of water level in each well casing as <br /> I compared to total well depth RMC then contacted a professional well sampling company <br /> (Blaine Tech Services, Inc ) to perform the development work <br /> IOn June 30, Blaine Tech Services was able to successfully develop the two new <br /> wells (MW-07 and MW-08) The development procedure was as follows <br /> • The well caps were removed prior to measurement, development and sampling to <br /> Iallow equilibrium with atmospheric pressure <br /> • Depth-to-water measurements were taken and recorded in each well using an <br /> electronic water tape (Table 3) <br /> • The volume of water in each well was calculated in the field using the depth-to- <br /> water measurements <br /> I • The wells were swabbed and surged with a four-inch surge block for ten minutes <br /> before a minimum of ten casing volumes were purged from them with a 2-inch <br /> diameter Middleburg electric submersible pump <br /> • Field readings were taken at approximately eight-gallon intervals to monitor the <br /> pH, temperature, turbidity and conductivity of the extracted water (copies of the <br /> field sheets are included in Appendix B) <br /> I • At the conclusion of each well's development, groundwater samples were <br /> collected into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 VOA vials and one-liter amber glass <br /> sample bottles <br /> • The sample containers were properly labeled, placed into a cool ice chest and <br /> transported under strict chain-of-custody documentation to Severn Trent <br /> Laboratory (STL) in Pleasanton, California for analysis <br /> I • The samples were analyzed by EPA method 8015M for diesel range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH-diesel) and by EPA method 8021 B for benzene, toluene, <br /> ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX) <br /> On July 21, 2004, after a dedicated bladder pump (QED model P 1101 M) was <br /> installed into each of the two new groundwater-monitoring wells, quarterly sampling <br /> I commenced on all of the site's five wells The sampling protocol was as follows <br /> 1 • The well caps were removed to allow for equilibrium with atmospheric pressure <br /> • Depth-to-water measurements were taken and recorded in the wells using an <br /> Ielectronic water tape (Table 3) <br /> The volume of water in each well was calculated in the field using the measured <br /> idepths-to-water <br /> I. <br /> I3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.