My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007370 CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
30350
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540424
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007370 CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 12:16:10 PM
Creation date
6/11/2020 12:06:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007370 CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0540424
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023098
FACILITY_NAME
RMC PACIFIC MATERIALS - T0607700371
STREET_NUMBER
30350
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TRACY
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
30350 S TRACY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A minimum of three casing volumes was purged from each monitor well before <br /> groundwater samples were taken <br /> I • Field readings were taken at approximately five-gallon intervals to monitor the <br /> pH, temperature, turbidity and conductivity of the extracted water (copies of the <br /> field sheets are included in Appendix B) <br /> • At the conclusion of each well's purging, groundwater samples were collected <br /> into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 VOA vials and one-liter amber glass sample <br /> bottles <br /> • The sample containers were properly labeled, placed into a cool ice chest and <br /> transported under strict chain-of-custody documentation to Severn Trent <br /> Laboratory (STL) in Pleasanton, California for analysis <br /> • The samples were analyzed by EPA method 8015M for diesel range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH-diesel) and by EPA method 8021B for benzene, toluene, <br /> Iethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX) <br /> IANALYTICAL RESULTS AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS <br /> Laboratory analyses of the soil samples collected from the eight borings report <br /> Ivery low concentrations of TPH-diesel throughout each of the soil columns The highest <br /> concentration (78 mg/kg) was found at a depth of 5 feet bsg to BH-15 but the <br /> concentrations decreased dramatically beyond that depth The second highest <br /> • concentration (66 mg/kg) was found in a soil sample taken from BH-16 at a depth of 114 <br /> feet bsg, however, the concentrations above and below that depth were much lower The <br /> analyses of the samples from the other six borings reported concentrations ranging from <br /> I1 6 mg/kg to a single high of 28 0 mg/kg The laboratory results for BTEX analyses on <br /> the soil samples extracted from the eight borings were all non-detect (<0 0050 mg/kg) <br /> I The results of the laboratory analyses are presented in Table 1 A copy of the laboratory <br /> analytical reports and the chain-of-custody records are included in Appendix A <br /> The laboratory analyses of groundwater samples taken at the culmination of the <br /> two new well's developments report non-detect (<50 µg/L) for TPH-diesel Analyses for <br /> volatile petroleum products (BTEX) in the samples resulted in findings of very low, <br /> I nearly identical, concentrations in both wells In MW-07, the reported concentrations <br /> were 2 9 µg/L benzene, 11 µg/L toluene, 2 7 µg/L ethyl benzene and 14 pg/L xylenes In <br /> MW-08, the reported concentrations were 2 5 µg/L benzene, 11 µg/L toluene, 2 8 µg/l, <br /> I ethyl benzene and 16 µg/L xylenes The results of the laboratory analyses are presented <br /> in Table 4 Copies of the laboratory reports and chain-of-custody records are included in <br /> Appendix A <br /> INo free-phase liquid hydrocarbon Iayer or sheen was seen on the water tape or the <br /> pump equipment during the development or sampling of the groundwater monitoring <br /> wells, and all purged and sampled water lacked any discernable odor(see field sheets, <br /> Appendix B) <br /> I 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.