Laserfiche WebLink
Item No . <br /> PC : 8-20-87 <br /> TA-86-2 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1 . Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt by reference <br /> the Negative Declaration prepared for TA-87-8 (Miscellaneous <br /> Text Amendments) ; and <br /> 2 . Forward TA-86-2 to the Board of Supervisors with a recommen- <br /> dation to approve the Text Amendment based on the Bases for <br /> Recommendation listed below. <br /> BASES FOR RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1 . The proposed Text Amendment is consistent with the General <br /> Plan because no new uses are proposed. <br /> 2 . The proposed Text Amendment will not have a substantial , <br /> adverse effect on properties affected by the amendment <br /> because the suggested revisions clarify and simplify existing <br /> provisions and make yard and area requirements more con- <br /> sistent from zone to zone. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> On July 31 , 1986 , the Planning Commission held a special meeting <br /> for public input on fence, building setback, and area regula- <br /> tions. At the meeting, several residents spoke to the current <br /> fence regulations, specifically the prohibition of fences over <br /> four feet in front yard setbacks. At the conclusion of this <br /> meeting, a special subcommittee of the Planning Commission was <br /> appointed to review current regulations and propose appropriate <br /> revisions . The Fence Subcommittee consists of Commissioners <br /> Jungeblut , Gabbard, and Carter . <br /> After several work sessions, the subcommittee came up with the <br /> enclosed recommended revisions . These standards were developed <br /> not only by reviewing the approaches of other local jurisdic- <br /> tions, but also by using visual aids and models, as well as by <br /> actual on-site visits . Their one overriding consideration in the <br /> development of the proposed revisions was that of safety and <br /> liability (see County Counsel memo , Attachment II ) . Even though <br /> the property owners at the special meeting wanted a reduction in <br /> current regulations , they acknowledged that fence location and <br /> type should not impact health and safety considerations . <br /> In addition to the proposed revisions to current requirements, <br /> new definitions and special provisions have also been developed. <br /> Refer to Attachment I for this additional language . <br />