My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013419
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTYWIDE
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
TA-86-2
>
SU0013419
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2020 8:55:30 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:11:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013419
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
TA-86-2
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
COUNTYWIDE
ENTERED_DATE
6/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
0 COUNTYWIDE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> 3 . TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO . TA-86-2 (FENCE REGULATIONS) OF <br /> THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION to amend the <br /> Planning Title of San Joaquin County to modify fence regula- <br /> tions in the agricultural and residential zones. Applicable <br /> Countywide . <br /> Tom Walker , Deputy Walker, introduced the staff report into the <br /> record. <br /> Comm. Morri said he did not agree with the restriction of having <br /> a six-foot-high limitation on rear fences on properties less than <br /> 20 acres . Seven feet should be permitted. <br /> Frank Bruno, Deputy County Counsel , noted that in Section 1 of <br /> the Ordinance , " . . . connected by should read " <br /> ,r• <br /> constructed of . . . . .. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: <br /> Mr. H. E. Parrish, of Linden, asked if the three-foot-high fence <<` <br /> requirement at the corners applied to barbed wire or chain link <br /> fence . <br /> Tom Walker said that would be considered an open fence and could <br /> be six-feet high. <br /> Bill Morgan, representing Morada Homeowners Association, said <br /> that back on July 31 , 1986 , it was stated that everyone at the <br /> meeting would be notified when a public hearing was to be held. <br /> He said-not everyone was notified of this hearing. He said that <br /> he is concerned about the 10-foot setback for gates. He said he <br /> has a gate on the property line , and he can pull his car out to <br /> close the gate without creating a hazard. He said the 10-foot <br /> setback would provide people with a public turn-around spot , and <br /> this would create more of a problem. <br /> Comm. Gillispie said it depends on where the edge of pavement of <br /> the travelled way is located in relation to the right-of-way. <br /> Tom Walker said a possible problem is that we are only requiring <br /> a 10-foot setback for six-foot-high fences. You can have a <br /> three-foot-high fence , and there is no requirement for a 10-foot <br /> setback. We should make that requirement consistent . It should <br /> be a 10-foot setback for all gates. <br /> Comm. Gillispie said the gate setback should be 16 feet from the <br /> edge of the travelled way or the right-of-way line, whichever <br /> comes first . We could create a hardship for some people where <br /> there is a large right-of-way and a narrow road. <br /> MINUTES FOR TA-86-2 -2- (PC : 8-20-87) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.