My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
29633
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541086
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 11:13:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 11:07:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0541086
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0003781
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY AIRPORT
STREET_NUMBER
29633
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25311031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
29633 S TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> The purpose of this work is to evaluate whether a declining trend of fuel contaminants are <br /> observed in the soils by sampling in the vicinity of the previously collected soil samples along <br /> the former pipeline from the dispenser island and in the former UST excavation areas. i <br /> 2.0 Ground Penetrating Radar and Utility Clearance and Aerial Photo Review <br /> Aerial photographs from H3W geospatial, Pacific Aerial Surveys (PAS) were purchased and <br /> reviewed. PAS Photo AV-2404-44 flown on December 20, 1983 showed the Iocation of the UST ; <br /> concrete tank pad, dispenser-island and apparent trench line between the UST and dispenser <br /> island. PAS Photo AV-6100-249-41 flown on August 17, 1999 showed the former locations of <br /> the UST concrete tank pad, dispenser-island and apparent trench line between the UST and <br /> dispenser island. Both photographs were used to measure and create scale distances from a <br /> known position (the existing hanger building) to locate the drilling targets indicated by EHD. <br /> These target locations were marked upon the existing tarmac and Underground Service Alert <br /> (USA)was notified for subsurface utility location. <br /> Wright also performed a limited ground penetrating radar geophysical study to confirm target j <br /> locations and further investigate and locate the former UST excavation, pipeline trace and island <br /> area and assisted in locating other underground utilities that might be in the vicinity of the <br /> proposed exploratory borings. <br /> The ground penetrating radar geophysical study confirmed the approximate locations of former <br /> pipeline and underground storage tank pit. This study was needed since the entire former <br /> pipeline and UST area was repaved. The radar work also indicated the location of septic system r <br /> features and a storm drain. <br /> 3.0 Field Methods--Drilling and Sampling Exploratory Borings <br /> Exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure. 1. Drilling permits were <br /> secured from EHD, and the above referenced underground utility clearance were performed prior <br /> to doing the fieldwork. Sample locations were made at locations approximately every 20-feet <br /> along the former pipeline to collect soil samples from a depth of 3-feet below the ground surface <br /> in native soil (corresponding to the approximately the same pipeline soil sample locations as in <br /> 1998). One deep boring (B-6).was advanced in the former UST pit to collect soil and ; <br /> groundwater samples. <br /> The boreholes were drilled with truck mounted GeoProbe 6600 direct-push drilling equipment. <br /> All drilling equipment and sampling tools were cleaned prior to arriving, between each sampling <br /> borehole and before leaving the site. The probe collected continuous cores of soil in each <br /> borehole. The sampler was then retrieved and dissembled and soil sample intervals retained for <br /> chemical analysis were cut from the liners at the desired depths. The soil sample was sealed with <br /> Teflon paper or foil and plastic endcaps, labeled, logged onto chain-of-custody forms and placed <br /> in a chilled ice chest on crushed ice for transport to the laboratory. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.