Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> analysis revealed that ❑&G was below detection limits. <br /> 1/17/1992 FGL Environmental wrote to EHD explaining the differ- <br /> ence in the results ''obtained by the two procedures, <br /> and provided additional data to show that the results <br /> were correct using EPA 418. 1 <br /> Unknown Spoil pile was characterized by Forward, Inc. <br /> 4/2&3/1992 Existing excavation filled with a total of 342 CY of <br /> clean soil obtained from A.A. & Bob Allen ''Co. , of <br /> Stockton. The soil was properly compacted and the <br /> surface. restored to it 's original condition using <br /> � Thoroe, l7i 1"`equi pment. <br /> 4/2,.3,6,&7/ All of the contaminated spoil , (270 CY) was removed <br /> 1992 from the site and transported to Forward Inc. for <br /> disposal . Copies of signed receipts are attached. <br /> COMMENTS: The UST has been removed and properly disposed of; all <br /> contamination has been removed from the site of the UST; the <br /> excavation has been filled with clean soil and properly compacted; <br /> the removed spoil has been transported to a licensed landfill ; and a <br /> final report has been prepared and submitted to the EHD. <br /> Therefore, it is requested that site closure be approved, and the <br /> owner be notified in writing as soon as possible. <br /> Oneun ter <br /> ccn Ann Dito <br /> II <br /> i <br />