My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013411
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
5301
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-88-6
>
SU0013411
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2020 12:15:26 PM
Creation date
6/16/2020 11:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013411
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-88-6
STREET_NUMBER
5301
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
15911013
ENTERED_DATE
6/9/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
5301 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 . DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . ER-88-6 OF MANUEL <br /> SANTOS 19,/0 G. M. WINCHELL & SONS) : Public comments are to be <br /> received on the report ' s adequacy in addressing the environmental <br /> consequence of a proposed General Plan Amendment and a consistent <br /> Zone Reclassification. The underlying project is to amend the <br /> General Plan from Medium Density Residential and Agriculture to <br /> Retail Commercial for a 10-acre portion of the 41 . 5-acre site and <br /> to Low Density Residential for a 26. 3-acre portion of the site, <br /> which would allow for the development of 104 single-family lots . <br /> The project site is located in Linden on the south side of State <br /> Route 26, east of its intersection with Ione Street . Copies of <br /> the Draft EIR are available for review at the office of the San <br /> Joaquin County Planning Division. (Supervisorial District 4) <br /> Kitty Walker, Senior Planner , introduced the project for the <br /> record and described the procedures to be followed in taking oral <br /> and written testimony on the adequacy of the Draft EIR. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: <br /> Sigrid Eilers, representing Peoples' Organization for Land <br /> Preservation (POLP) , said that the EIR was a good document but <br /> that it was lacking several mitigation measures. The EIR states <br /> that approximately 64 new students would be added to the school <br /> for this project . This figure is based on 0.7-students per <br /> dwelling. According to the Draft EIR, the elementary school has <br /> a much larger entry of school-age children than the high school. <br /> The EIR does mention that the average number of students in <br /> Linden is 26 per classroom, but it does not take into account <br /> special education classes that serve other needs. Therefore <br /> those figures are a little bit distorted. An important impact <br /> that should also be addressed is that if the majority of children <br /> tend to be grammer school age, there will be a larger significant <br /> impact on those children because the younger they are, the more <br /> direct attention they need from their teachers. When they reach <br /> high school, if the classes are up to 32 per person, they may be <br /> able to handle that a little better. It is stated by the <br /> Superintendent which Mills and Assocites have had most of the <br /> correspondence with that most of the children will be of the <br /> younger age. The Superintendent did not provide Mills and <br /> Assocites with more figures to go on. However, he subsequently <br /> did provide more figures, and a written communication will be <br /> forthcoming from the School Board and the Superintendent. The <br /> total cost of the Santos project to the school, which includes <br /> site preparation, restrooms, architectural fees, and classroom <br /> size, amounts to $203 , 280. That is a large amount of money that <br /> the school district is going to have to carry. However, with the <br /> 88, which is based upon a figure of $2 , 600 per student , you <br /> multiply that by 64, you come up with a $166, 400. That leaves a <br /> discrepancy of quite a few thousand that is going to have to be <br /> covered. Some mitigation measures have to be taken. Mills & <br /> Associates suggests that the Board of Supervisors make an <br /> assessment district out of the school district and perhaps <br /> through taxation we can come up with that figure, the $40,000 we <br /> are lacking. However, if an assessment district is formed, it <br /> PC Minutes - 8 - (PC: 7-21-88) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.