Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT • 4 <br /> SPX CORPORATION <br /> MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Concerning the Discharger's comments, although the discharge supports the aquatic environment, <br /> aquatic life beneficial uses apply to the SDC from the point of discharge to the confluence with the <br /> Calaveras River and must be protected. Available information suggests that the SDC is at times dry, <br /> absent the discharge, and may be dry for extended periods. EPA ambient water quality criteria for <br /> copper and hexavalent chromium are composed of one hour(acute), and four day(chronic) criterion <br /> values. The new limits were developed to protect aquatic life during these periods of limited or no <br /> dilution. <br /> With regard to Deltakeeper's comment on the compliance schedule justification,prior to issuance of the <br /> Tentative Order, the Discharger was unaware of the outcome of the reasonable potential analysis, and <br /> establishment of new effluent limitations. The Discharger did not have an opportunity to comment on <br /> Findings in the permit prior to issuance of the Tentative Order, and has not had an opportunity to contest <br /> items of the proposed Order with which they do not agree. The Discharger has made diligent efforts to <br /> quantify pollutant levels and their sources. Source control and/or pollutant minimization measures are <br /> not relevant to this groundwater remedial action. Text in the proposed Order has been revised to read <br /> that if a compliance schedule justification is not submitted within 80 days of permit adoption, the final <br /> effluent limitations will become effective on that date. <br /> Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing <br /> This proposed Order includes requirements for continued chronic WET Testing. The Discharger <br /> commented that historical aquatic testing has shown that the discharge meets criteria, and that the results <br /> of a Toxicity Identification Evaluation(TIE) conducted in 1995 in response to sub lethal toxic effects <br /> was inconclusive. <br /> Sporadic instances of unknown toxicity have been reported in WET testing accomplished by the <br /> Discharger in the past. Staff does not agree that continued toxicity testing is unnecessary based on the <br /> fact that results of the 1995 TIE were inconclusive. TIE test methods have improved <br /> since that time, and short-term WET tests are a necessary part of the <br /> weight of evidence approach to assessing toxics control and toxicity. In the Technical Support <br /> Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control (TSD,March 1991), USEPA recommends an <br /> integrated chemical-specific,whole effluent and bioassessment approach to fully protect aquatic <br /> habitats. This proposed Order requires chronic toxicity testing in accordance with the latest USEPA test <br /> methods which were revised in December 2002. <br /> September 2002 Release, Fish Kill Incident <br /> The September 2002 release that resulted in a fish kill was caused by a pH meter malfunction. The false <br /> pH signal in tum caused the caustic pH adjustment pump to continuously operate. Because the meter <br /> signal was frozen and sending a false low pH signal, the system shut-down feature did not activate as it <br /> was designed to do. The malfunction resulted in a discharge of approximately 2160 gallons of 50%by <br /> weight sodium hydroxide into the SDC and a fish kill of approximately 4,500 fish in the SDC. The <br /> Discharger has installed some additional pH control measures to prevent such an event in the future. <br /> l <br />