Laserfiche WebLink
09 August 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0466 ' <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br /> t . <br /> • Advancement of two soil borings,fo 50'feet bsg' the former dispenser-area excavation and <br /> in the former UST pit to collect•soil and ground water samples; <br /> Obtaining laboratory analysis of the ground wat r samples and selected soil samples; and <br /> • . Preparation of a site assessment report or a-clos a summary report, as appropriate,based on.. <br /> the results of the investigation. <br /> A'site plan showing structures and boring locations on the subject property is shown on Figure 2: <br /> This closure summary reporthas'been prepared in acco dance with PHS-EHD and Central.Valley <br /> Regional Water Quality Control"Board'(CVRWQCB) guidelines. <br /> 2.0. -BACKGROUND <br /> ` A. 10;000-gallon, steel underground-storage.tank (UST).was utilized for diesel fuel on the site as <br /> early as.1983. The UST'system failed a precision test on 18 November 1988 and a product line was <br /> r^ repaired on 15 December 1988. . <br /> r" 2.1. UST REMOVAL <br /> The UST was removed under inspection by the PHS-E D on 27 August 1993. Two soil samples <br /> were collected from beneath the former UST location and two samples were collected from beneath <br /> the product line piping: The samples collected under the north end of the UST and the north end of <br /> the product line..contained.less .than detectable concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPH-d), and <br /> benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX}. TPH-g and TPH4 were detected in the south <br /> r., UST sample at concentrations of 5.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 63 mg/kg; and in the . <br /> south product line piping sample at concentrations of 89 mg/kg and 910 mg/kg,-respectively. A <br /> :,piping stockpile soil sample contained 450 mg/kg PH-g and 5,800 .mg/kg TPH4 Minor <br /> concentrations of.toluene, ethylbenzene.and xylenes w re detected in some samples; benzene was <br /> not detected ir[any samples. The analytical results of the soil samples are included in Table 1. <br /> 2.2, SITE REMEDIATION <br /> Excavation was initiated on the site withouta site assessment having been performed. A letter work <br /> Plan for excavation of impacted soil was prepared by Stockton Service .Station Equipment Co., Inc. <br /> (SSSEC) on 27 January.1994 and amended by an add ndum dated, 02 March 1994. The area of <br /> Advauced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />