Laserfiche WebLink
09 August 1999 <br /> u <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0466 <br /> Page 7of10 <br /> sampled soil. Upon irecovery of the sampler, the secorid leading brass sleeve was-preserved,by <br /> r covering both open ends with Teflon sheets, capping vrith plastic end-caps and sealing with duct`_ <br /> tape. The sealed samples were labeled with the boring designation, sampling depth, date, time and <br /> sampler's initials. The preserved samples were then Cored in an ice-chilled container pending <br /> shipment under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI), a California Department <br /> of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laborator7: <br /> .� Soil visually were v <br /> sample duplicates described in accoidance with the Unified Soil Classification <br /> P p y <br /> System(USCS,.as per Visual Classification of Soils, 1986, Bureau.of Reclamation Engineering and <br /> Research Center) and were screened for the presence of organic.vapor utilizing an organic vapor <br /> _meter(OVM) equipped with_a photo-ionization dete'eto '(PID: Thermo Environmental 580A, 10.0 <br /> eV, calibrated to 100 ppm isobutylene). Boring logs are included as Appendix A. <br /> Selected soil samples were analyzed for: , <br /> r =• . Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as die el (TPH-d) by EPA Method 8015.-M, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylen.s (BTEX)by EPA Method 8020; and <br /> Methyl.tert butyl ether.(MTBE)by EPA Metho 8260.' <br /> r-. At the direction of the PHS-EHD,a soil sample was c llected from a soil stockpile of uncertain <br /> origin located near the former UST No:. 1 facility on 2 June 1999: The sample was collected by <br /> 'digging approximately 1:5-feet into'the stockpile and.dri ing a 2-inch by-6-inch brass sleeve into the <br /> R exposed soil utilizing a metric sampler and drive hamme The,soil-filled brass sleeve was preserved' <br /> and labeled as:described above; entered onto achain-a custody form, and stored in an ice-chilled <br /> container pending shipment to MAI:under chain-of-cust dy. The PHS-EHD directed that the sample <br /> be analyzed only for BTEX: <br /> 3.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANAL SIS <br /> Grab ground water samples were collected though a Geo robe ground water sampling device. Water <br /> samples..were collected from P2, P3 and P4 at 50 feet b 3g..After collecting the Enol soil sample at <br /> 50 feet bsg, the water sampling device was driven a foot or so into the soil-at total depth, the <br /> assembly was then raised to'expose 3 feet of a 1-inch iameter, 0.002-inch slotted.screened.PVC . <br /> casing: Ground water was then collected utilizing polyethylene tubing with a check valve to pump <br /> water.to the surface. The ground water samples retric ved from.probe'borings P2 and P3.were <br />. collected into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containin 0.5 mi 18%hydrochloric acid.as a sample <br /> preservative. Sufficient.water sample for analysis for , iesel fuel was inadvertently'not collected- <br /> during the initial sampling.event; with PHS-EHD concurrence, soil probe boring•P4 was advanced <br /> adjacent to soil.probe boring P3 in the kirmer excavation-area to collect a water sample specifically, . <br /> Aihanced GeoEnvieonmental,Inc. <br />