My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
2801
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0504943
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2020 5:52:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2020 3:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0504943
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0004032
FACILITY_NAME
AMERICAN MOULDING & MILLWORK (FRMR)
STREET_NUMBER
2801
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11709001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2801 WEST LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09 August 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0466 <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> Damp,to moist silt and clayey silt was encountered at 45 feet and 50 feet bsg in P4.None of the soil <br /> samples released detectable concentrations of volatile organic compounds that could be detected with <br /> the OVM. Hydrocarbon,odor was not noted for any of the soil samples. None of the soil samples <br /> r appeared to be stained... <br /> None of the analytes of interest(TPH-d, BTEX or MTBE)were present at detectable concentrations <br /> in any of the six analyzed soil samples (PI-DI 0,P2-1325, P2-D35, P3-D45, P3-50, and.SP1). <br /> Neither BTEX compounds nor MTBE were detected in ground water samples,P2-6/22/99 or P3- <br /> 6122199. TPH-d was detected at 110 micrograms per li er (µg11) in grab ground water sample P4- <br /> 6/24/99. Analytical results for the,'current investigation are tabulated in Tables 4 and'5. <br /> 5.0. .DISCUSSION <br /> i" The results demonstrate that the release of diesel fuel de cted in the former UST pit during the tank <br /> t removal either was of very small volume or did not originate from the UST itself. No indication of <br /> diesel fuel-impacted soil underlying-the former UST was encountered during this investigation. The <br /> area under the former UST where 63 mg/kg TPH-d was ncountered in soil was not excavated, but." <br /> the extent of the TPH-d-impacted soil under the former UST is quite limited, as shown.by the Iack <br /> of detectable TPH-d concentrationin soil samples PI-13.20, P2-D25 and P2-D35, all underlying the <br /> former UST site. <br /> Assuming that the-area of impacted soil at the south end f the former UST hada radius of 5 feet and <br /> the impacted soil,extended 10 feet below the impacted soil sample, the'volume of impacted soil <br /> would be approximately 29 cubic yards. if the whole volume was evenly impacted by the 63 mg/kg <br /> TPH-d detected, then the calculated mass of diesel el in the soil would be 4.93 lbs and the <br /> impacting diesel, fuel would have a volume of 0.7 gallons, as calculated for the removed soil in <br /> Section 2.3. above.-AGE believes this to be an oversimplification and probably an overestimation <br /> r of TPH-d left in place in the former UST.No.I pit: <br /> The significant diesel fuel `release from the dispens r and/or product piping was apparently <br /> effectively removed during the excavation-remedial action. No indication of diesel fuel-impacted <br /> soil was encountered in the backfilled soil or in the nativ ,soil underlying the backfilled excavation. <br />. The only possible,indication of the diesel release enc untered was the-minimal 110 µg11 TPH=d - <br /> detected in the .grab ground water sample collected beneaff the backfilled excavation. The <br /> concentration is low and of little potential environmental concern. The detected TPH-d may be the <br /> result of ground water in contact with a small pod of impacted soil Ieft in place during excavation <br /> of impacted soil or may have originated-from the up-grad ient former UST site located within a few <br /> hundred of feet ofthe former UST No. 1. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.