Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> In order to assess the requirements of bioremediation, a treatability study conducted with heavily <br />' impacted soil samples obtained from the site was conducted from January 18 to March 15, 1990, and the <br /> results included in the Workplan The nutrient and moisture requirements as well as the time needed to <br /> degrade diesel to the cleanup objective, 100 mg/kg TPH/D, were estimated based on the results of the <br />' treatability study and included in the Workplan The on-site treatment of excavated soil is described in <br /> Section 4 2 of this report <br />' 2 6 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CLOSE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS STORING <br /> HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br />' <br /> Following demolition of the maintenance shop and soil excavation, treatment and disposal, and <br />' Mr Marvin Palmer of AM&M was contacted by PHS-ESD, in January, 1991 The PHS-EHD stated that <br /> after reviewing their files, the underground pipe connecting the 10,000 gallon diesel UST to the pump <br /> island had not been removed The PHS-EHD requested that the pipe be removed and decontaminated <br />' under the supervision of a PHS-EHD representative, in order to close the UST, and enclosed PHS-EHD's <br /> "Application for Permit to Close Underground Storage Tank Containing Hazardous Materials" AFPC <br /> submitted the completed application including pertinent figures, soil sampling and analytical plan and a <br /> Health and Safety Plan consistent with the county requirements to the PHS-EHD and the RWQCB on <br /> April 12, 1991 (Dames & Moore, 1991) The application was received and verbally approved in early <br /> May 1991, and work began in mid-June, 1991 Details of the removal, decontamination and disposal <br /> of the underground piping are describe below in Section 4 2 <br />' 2 7 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> As discussed in previous sections, JHKA installed three groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1, <br /> MW-2, and MW-3, Figure 2 1) in the vicinity of the maintenance shop Groundwater samples were <br />' collected by Kleinfelder in July of 1987 and analyzed for volatile organics (EPA Method 602), phenols <br /> (EPA Method 604), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (EPA Method 610) and TPHID (EPA Method <br />' 8015) None of the above listed constituents were detected in the groundwater samples (Appendix B) <br /> On June 13 and 15, 1988, and on January 31, 1989 Dames & Moore measured water levels and <br />' sampled groundwater from the three JHKA monitoring wells under a workplan approved by the <br /> PHS-EHD The results of the January 31, 1989 sampling were reported to PHS-EHD in a letter report <br />' included in Appendix E The overall groundwater gradient was relatively flat (0 0015 to 0 0016 feet per <br /> linear foot), and groundwater flow direction was toward the north/northwest There was also a distinct <br /> drop in water levels, as two of the three JHKA wells could not be sampled in June 1988, as the water <br /> level had dropped approximately 10 to 15 feet since the wells were installed in July 1987 <br /> 5AC36 046 9 <br /> I <br />