Laserfiche WebLink
• on p. 4 . 3-4 , it states that two-thirds of the easement areas <br /> have severe constraints due to the very shallow depth of soil . <br /> D2 over hardpan. Another three sites have severe constraints due <br /> to high groundwater conditions. <br /> • He questions the use of the golf course facility based on a <br /> D3 projected 100 additional persons for one weekend per month <br /> during tournaments. He does not know of any tournaments that <br /> L— would attract only 100 people. <br /> �— <br /> D4 He is skeptical of the adequacy of 200 percent leach fields. <br /> D5 Since this will be a community type of development, a <br /> community level treatment of wastewater is well justified. <br /> • Another adequacy problem is fire protection. Page 4 . 8-1 deals <br /> with Forest Lake and Woodbridge fire protection districts. <br /> Forest Lake is currently responsible for the major portion of <br /> this project. It is closer in distance, but it is a volunteer r <br /> D6 department. What is important is the response time at the <br /> time of an emergency. Woodbridge could be very competitive in <br /> regard to response time. Woodbridge is a paid, full-time <br /> department. Forest Lake' s volume capacity for its pump is not <br /> listed on p. 4 .8-1. Woodbridge' s water tender volume capacity <br /> is listed as a 4, 000-gallon per minute unit on p. 4 .8-1. This <br /> volume seems unreasonable in the circumstances of the <br /> Woodbridge Fire District. <br /> Waldo Holt (3900 River Drive, Stockton) , the Conservation Chair of <br /> the Audubon Society: <br /> • The DEIR fails to state impacts to the greater sandhill crane <br /> and provide mitigation measures. Sandhill cranes utilize the - <br /> project site and neighboring fields every year. They are <br /> D7 extremely intolerant of humans. <br /> • This section of San Joaquin County is the most important <br /> wintering habitat area for the entire threatened race. <br /> DS Appendix F, the bird list, has several inaccuracies 'and should <br /> .z <br /> i8 not be relied upon. <br /> Mitigations for Swainsons hawks are insufficient. The project <br /> D9 proponents should mitigate for loss of foraging habitat as <br /> L— well as nesting habitat. <br /> The 1995 General Plan mentions Brovelli Woods as a significant <br /> D10 oak grove that should be protected and considered for public <br /> acquisition. <br /> Minutes - 2 - (ER-91-2) t <br /> IV-2 <br />