My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013451
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAKE FOREST
>
2248
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
WC-90-1
>
SU0013451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013451
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
WC-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
2248
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LAKE FOREST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00306001
ENTERED_DATE
6/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2248 W LAKE FOREST RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D81: Until grazing is stopped long enough for the annual grass mat to provide the basis for a microtine <br /> population to persist, the only available rodent prey for the Swainson's hawk is the California <br /> ground squirrel. The primary food source for the Swainson's hawk are small rodents such as the <br /> California meadow mouse and gophers. Management for the ground squirrel can be achieved <br /> by increasing the intensity of grazing,but the promotion of a more varied and stable rodent and <br /> lagomorph prey base through the elimination or highly restricted use of grazing would be far <br /> more biologically sound. <br /> D82: The waterbird counts and species variety reported in this study for only the latter one-third of the <br /> wintering season does not support the commenter's statement that, ". . . the Tracy lakes <br /> represent a poor example of wetlands from a wildlife perspective." If we further take into <br /> consideration the San Joaquin Audubon Society's past records for this site which lists 50 species <br /> of Anseriforms, Charadriiforms,Gruiforms,Ciconiformes and Peliconiformes which utilize this <br /> site, Buckeye Ranch takes on the appearance of a major waterbird sanctuary. <br /> D83: The whole point concerning the Tracy Lakes is that they be allowed to function as a seasonal <br /> wetland, including the summer drying stages. The EIR biologist calls for artificial water input <br /> as a management tool for the winters of drought years only, but the water will still go through <br /> the normal evaporation cycle when warm weather occurs. <br /> D84: The only additional waterbird that might frequent the site if North Tracy Lake is deepened and <br /> held in a permanent wetland state would be one or two species of wintering loons and larger <br /> grebes. This would hardly offset the great loss of inshore shallow foraging areas for dabbling <br /> ducks, geese and swans which would be lost by this process. Deep, steep-sided reservoirs are <br /> not an "endangered habitat" in Central California,but vanishing shallow seasonal wetlands are. <br /> It is the preservation of the latter which continues to be the main focus of the protection agencies <br /> and the 1929 Migratory Bird Conservation Act. <br /> D85: If South Tracy lake is allowed to function naturally, then the island is only good during the <br /> winter non-nesting period. When nesting occurs the water will have dropped enough to create <br /> a peninsula. <br /> D86: There seems to be some confusion between the status, code and discussion in the text, <br /> particularly,confusion over the definition of"greater project area". Thus, this has been changed <br /> as follows. <br /> B = Breeds in northern San Joaquin County, Lodi-Galt Area <br /> If an endangered,threatened or candidate species was found to be nesting(breeding)on the site, <br /> this was discussed in the text. As a point of information,this status legend is typically used in <br /> EIR reports to identify the many species which are in a project area. Nowhere in the text is it <br /> stated that either the Cooper's hawk or the northern harrier nests (breeds) on the site. Indeed, <br /> the two sightings of the Cooper's hawk were considered "fly bys," thus they were not listed as <br /> a species which was actually seen utilizing the site other than for air space. Another example, <br /> as stated by the commenter, is that the violet green swallow does not nest on the valley floor. <br /> This bird has beenseen nesting in Caswell State Park (on the valley floor) and it was observed <br /> on the site. <br /> D87: Opinion noted. <br /> VI-162 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.