Laserfiche WebLink
4.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING POLICY <br /> public access to the Mokelumne River. Public access to Tracy Lakes would also be restricted. <br /> Tracy Lakes is an ecological sensitive area as discussed in the revised Biological Resources section <br /> 4.7. As such, mitigation measures call for restricting human activity around South Tracy Lake <br /> during the Central Valley waterfowl wintering season and during the remaining months of the <br /> year, human activity around the lake should be limited and kept at a distance. <br /> The SLC has stated that the applicant must provide access along the waterway out of fee lands. <br /> Access through the subdivision to the waterways may be waived only if provisions of Section <br /> 66478.4 are met (SLC, April 6, 1992). <br /> Based en the fellewing , County Counsel has determined that public access would not have to be <br /> provided: 1) public access to the site is not desirable because the public would have to traverse private <br /> land and private roads;2)it is a small subdivision in a relatively remote location;3)riverbanks are steep; <br /> 4) there is the likelihood of trespass on adjacent agricultural lands; and, 5)there are unique cultural and <br /> biological resources on site. Public access could cause deterioration of these unique, significant <br /> resources. Therefore, lack of public access is considered a less-than-significant impact. <br /> Mitigation <br /> 4.1-3 No mitigation measure is required or recommended. <br /> Impact <br /> 4.1-4 The proposed project would not provide any recreation, open space or <br /> natural areas available to the public as outlined in the County's Draft <br /> General Plan. <br /> No public recreation, open space or natural areas would be provided. The proposed 2010 Plan shows <br /> Brovelli Woods and the Mokelumne River as Significant Resource Areas for Recreation that needs to <br /> be protected. The Plan notes that desirable recreation improvements on the site would be as a nature <br /> study site (Table II.E-2, Public Facilities Appendix,2010 Plan). <br /> Given the biological and cultural sensitivity of the site, the demand for public access appears detrimental <br /> to the protection of the site's resources. The 2010 Plan allows that there are various recreation needs <br /> and that some protection of unique sites should be considered. <br /> "It shall be recognized that the value of some public land may lie in the preservation of <br /> natural or historic features with no public uses permitted on the site." (Recreation Policy <br /> 9) <br /> 4.1-15 <br />